Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935881›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2021

Quantitative Analysis of Translatory Movements in Patients With Horizontal Strabismus.

Yeji Moon, Won June Lee, Seung Hak Shin, Ji Young Lee, Su-Jae Lee, Byoung-Woo Ko, Han Woong Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ocular Translation Due to Gravitational Acceleration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yeji MoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Won June LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Hak ShinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Young LeeHanyang Vision Research Center, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Su-Jae LeeDepartment of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Byoung-Woo KoApgujeong Eye Center, Seoul, Korea.
Han Woong LimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hanyang University · KRHanyang University Seoul Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate translatory movement during the lateral gaze in patients with horizontal strabismus using magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: Patients with esotropia or exotropia and normal controls underwent orbital magnetic resonance imaging during the central gaze and lateral gaze at 40°. The position of the static tissues was superimposed three-dimensionally for all gazes using a self-developed software, allowing the analysis of the net eyeball movement. Then, the eyeball centroid coordinates were extracted for each gaze, and the distance and direction of centroid movement from the central to lateral gaze were calculated. Results: The mean distance ± standard deviation of the centroid movement was 1.0 ± 0.5 mm during abduction in the exotropia group, which was significantly longer than that in the esotropia (0.6 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.003) and control (0.7 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.002) groups. Conversely, the centroid moved farther in the esotropia group (0.9 ± 0.3 mm) than the exotropia (0.6 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.005) and control (0.7 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.023) groups during adduction. Posterior translation during abduction was longer in the exotropia group (-0.8 ± 0.3 mm) compared with the esotropia (-0.5 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.017) and control (-0.4 ± 0.3 mm; P = 0.001) groups, whereas that during adduction was longer in the esotropia group (-0.4 ± 0.4 mm) than the exotropia (-0.1 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.033) and control (-0.1 ± 0.2 mm; P = 0.026) groups. Conclusions: During abduction, more translatory movement occurred in the exotropia group, whereas the centroid moved farther in the esotropia group during adduction. The translatory movement difference between both strabismus groups implies that there is a difference in biomechanics among the types of strabismus.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaEsotropiaExotropiaEyeEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOculomotor MusclesProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34935881
PMCPMC8711004
OpenAlexW4200429516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.