Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935878›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Learning to see again: Perceptual learning of simulated abnormal on- off-cell population responses in sighted individuals.

Rebecca B Esquenazi, Kimberly Meier, Michael Beyeler, Geoffrey M Boynton, Ione Fine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca B EsquenaziDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, USA.
Kimberly MeierDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, USA.
Michael BeyelerDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Geoffrey M BoyntonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, USA.
Ione FineDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USIonian University · GRUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologiesR01EY031312 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOYNTON, GEOFFREY M, FINE, IONE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Visual Cortical Plasticity and the Implications for Sight Restoration TechnologiesF31EY031164 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ESQUENAZI, REBECCA · 2020 to 2022
$117k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY031164NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031312NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many forms of artificial sight recovery, such as electronic implants and optogenetic proteins, generally cause simultaneous, rather than complementary firing of on- and off-center retinal cells. Here, using virtual patients-sighted individuals viewing distorted input-we examine whether plasticity might compensate for abnormal neuronal population responses. Five participants were dichoptically presented with a combination of original and contrast-reversed images. Each image (I) and its contrast-reverse (I') was filtered using a radial checkerboard (F) in Fourier space and its inverse (F'). [I * F'] + [I' * F] was presented to one eye, and [I * F] + [I' * F'] was presented to the other, such that regions of the image that produced on-center responses in one eye produced off-center responses in the other eye, and vice versa. Participants continuously improved in a naturalistic object discrimination task over 20 one-hour sessions. Pre-training and post-training tests suggest that performance improvements were due to two learning processes: learning to recognize objects with reduced visual information and learning to suppress contrast-reversed image information in a non-eye-selective manner. These results suggest that, with training, it may be possible to adapt to the unnatural on- and off-cell population responses produced by electronic and optogenetic sight recovery technologies.

Indexed as

LearningVisual PerceptionHumansNeuronsVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID34935878
PMCPMC8727313
OpenAlexW4200315162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.