ArticleThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Establishing Validity of the Midlife Black Women's Stress-Reduction Wellness Program Materials Using a Mixed Methods Approach.
Article in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04404478 (Stress-reduction Wellness Program for Midlife Black Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stress-reduction Wellness Program for Midlife Black Women (B-SWELL)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participant Satisfaction in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Intervention for Midlife Black Women.Western journal of nursing research · 2024Trial
- A randomized feasibility trial of the Midlife Black Women's Stress and Wellness intervention (B-SWELL); a community participatory intervention to increase adoption of Life's Simple 7 healthy lifestyle behaviors.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Trial
- Trial
- The Impact of a Human Papillomavirus Facebook-Based Intervention (#HPVVaxTalks) Among Young Black (African American and Sub-Saharan African Immigrants) Adults: Pilot Pre- and Poststudy.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveContent validation is an integral part of intervention development and should be established before initiation of trials. In collaboration with a community research advisory board, the objective of this study was to analyze expert ratings and qualitative feedback for the Midlife Black Women's Stress-Reduction Wellness (B-SWELL) intervention materials.
methodsThe B-SWELL intervention is a culturally tailored 8-week intervention designed to lower cardiovascular disease risk in midlife Black women by leveraging stress reduction and promoting the adoption of the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 healthy lifestyle behaviors. Using a mixed methods approach, 12 experts consisting of midlife Black women (n = 6), researchers (n = 3), and integrative health specialists (n = 3) rated the B-SWELL materials for content accuracy, topic relevance, stress relevance, cultural appropriateness, feasibility, usefulness, ease of use, and appeal using a 5-point Likert scale (1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree). Qualitative narrative data were integrated with the ratings.
resultsCombined expert ratings for the B-SWELL materials were high (range, 4.43-4.66). Group ratings differed, with midlife Black women having the highest mean ratings for both the individual B-SWELL modules and the overall binder (4.71 and 4.97, respectively), followed by researchers (4.56 and 4.73, respectively) and integrative health specialists (4.11 and 4.40, respectively). Qualitative data provided insight into deficiencies, supporting refinements of the B-SWELL materials.
conclusionsThe B-SWELL materials exhibited strong evidence of content and face validity. Researchers and clinicians are encouraged to establish content validity before implementation of culturally appropriate interventions aimed at high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.