ArticleInvestigative radiology2022
Reliable Assessment of Swine Renal Fibrosis Using Quantitative Magnetization Transfer Imaging.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiparametric MRI for Early Chronic Kidney Disease Detection: Insights Into Renal Microcirculation.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Progress of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of transplanted kidney function.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Non-invasive assessment techniques for renal fibrosis: advances and perspectives.Renal failure · 2025Review
- The proton resonance enhancement for CEST imaging and shift exchange (PRECISE) family of RF pulse shapes for CEST MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in imaging techniques to assess kidney fibrosis.Renal failure · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Renal Fibrosis Using Magnetization Transfer Imaging at 1.5T and 3T in a Porcine Model of Renal Artery Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesQuantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) is useful for measurement of murine renal fibrosis at high and ultrahigh field strengths. However, its utility at clinical field strengths and in human-like kidneys remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that qMT would successfully detect fibrosis in swine kidneys with unilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) at 3.0 T.
methodsThe qMT protocol is composed of MT scans with variable flip angles and offset frequencies, and of B0, B1, and T1 mapping. Pigs were scanned 10 weeks after RAS or control. A 2-pool model was used to fit the bound pool fraction f of the renal cortex (CO) and outer medulla (OM). Then qMT-derived f in 5 normal and 10 RAS pigs was compared with histological fibrosis determined using Masson's trichrome staining and to renal perfusion assessed with computed tomography.
resultsThe qMT 2-pool model provided accurate fittings of data collected on swine kidneys. Stenotic kidneys showed significantly elevated f in both the CO (9.8% ± 2.7% vs 6.4% ± 0.9%, P = 0.002) and OM (7.6% ± 2.2% vs 4.7% ± 1.1%, P = 0.002), as compared with normal kidneys. Histology-measured renal fibrosis and qMT-derived f correlated directly in both the cortex (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.93, P < 0.001) and OM (r = 0.84, P = 0.002), and inversely with stenotic kidney perfusion (r = 0.85, P = 0.002).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of qMT for measuring fibrosis in human-like swine kidneys, and the association between tissue macromolecule content and renal perfusion. Therefore, qMT may be useful as a tool for noninvasive assessment of renal fibrosis in subjects with RAS at clinical field strengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.