Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935535›Full record

ArticleJournal of telemedicine and telecare2024

Use and impact of virtual primary care on quality and safety: The public's perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ana Luisa Neves, Jackie van Dael, Niki O'Brien, Kelsey Flott, Saira Ghafur, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Huisarts en wetenschap · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Luisa NevesImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jackie van DaelImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Niki O'BrienImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8389-1448
Kelsey FlottImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Saira GhafurImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ara DarziImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Erik MayerImperial NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the onset of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), primary care has swiftly transitioned from face-to-face to virtual care, yet it remains largely unknown how this has impacted the quality and safety of care. We aim to evaluate patient use of virtual primary care models during COVID-19, including change in uptake, perceived impact on the quality and safety of care and willingness of future use. METHODOLOGY: An online cross-sectional survey was administered to the public across the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Germany. McNemar tests were conducted to test pre- and post-pandemic differences in uptake for each technology. One-way analysis of variance was conducted to examine patient experience ratings and perceived impacts on healthcare quality and safety across demographic characteristics.

resultsRespondents (n = 6326) reported an increased use of telephone consultations ( + 6.3%, DISCUSSION: Future work must examine the drivers and determinants of positive experiences using remote care to co-create a supportive environment that ensures equitable adoption and use. Comparative analysis between countries and health systems offers the opportunity for policymakers to learn from best practices internationally.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansMalePandemicsPrimary Health CareCOVID-19primary careTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34935535
PMCPMC10792996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.