ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Procedural Risk in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization (PREDIC
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and Risk Factors of Transcatheter Interventions to Create or Enlarge an Atrial Communication.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- How to evaluate, triage, and sedate a patient in the congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Factors Associated with Intensive Care Unit Admission Following Elective Cardiac Catheterization in Children without a Recent History of Cardiac Surgery or Major Noncardiac Comorbidities.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Use of CRISP Modifiers for Adults Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Procedures: A Single Center Experience.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life, Challenges, and Experiences of Patients With Congenital Heart Disease After Cardiac Catheterization: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Perforation in Pulmonary Atresia With Intact Ventricular Septum: Multicenter Comparison of Radiofrequency Versus Chronic Total Occlusion Wires.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- A Landscape Analysis of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Services in Africa.World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2025Review
- Formulation of Quality Improvement Methodology for Risk Mitigation in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Prolonged Length of Stay After Elective Same-Day Admissions for Pediatric or Congenital Cardiac Catheterizations: A Potential Measure for Procedural Harm.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Novel Uses of the SwiftNinja Steerable Microcatheter for Pediatric Cardiovascular Interventions.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Review
- Cardiac Catheterization and Interventions in Pediatric Patients on ECMO: Analysis of the IMPACT Registry.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Generating Risk Reduction Analytics in Complex Cardiac Care Environments (GRJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Congenital heart disease cardiac catheterization at Uganda Heart Institute, a 12-year retrospective study of immediate outcomes.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- PICS/AEPC/APPCS/CSANZ/SCAI/SOLACI: Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiac Catheterization for Pediatric Patients and Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- Efficiency and Impact of Hypnoanalgesia for Cardiac Catheterisation in Paediatric Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Congenital Cardiac Catheterization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The International Quality Improvement Collaborative Catheterization Registry.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Outcomes Comparisons Based on Gross National Income: Problems Without Borders?JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Recommendations for developing effective and safe paediatric and congenital heart disease services in low-income and middle-income countries: a public health framework.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Predictors of Serious Adverse Events and High-Level Cardiorespiratory Support in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Vein Interventions.Pediatric cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Advancements in the field, including novel procedures and multiple interventions, require an updated approach to accurately assess patient risk. This study aims to modernize patient hemodynamic and procedural risk classification through the creation of risk assessment tools to be used in congenital cardiac catheterization. Methods and Results Data were collected for all cases performed at sites participating in the C3PO (Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Project on Outcomes) multicenter registry. Between January 2014 and December 2017, 23 119 cases were recorded in 13 participating institutions, of which 88% of patients were <18 years of age and 25% <1 year of age; a high-severity adverse event occurred in 1193 (5.2%). Case types were defined by procedure(s) performed and grouped on the basis of association with the outcome, high-severity adverse event. Thirty-four unique case types were determined and stratified into 6 risk categories. Six hemodynamic indicator variables were empirically assessed, and a novel hemodynamic vulnerability score was determined by the frequency of high-severity adverse events. In a multivariable model, case-type risk category (odds ratios for category: 0=0.46, 1=1.00, 2=1.40, 3=2.68, 4=3.64, and 5=5.25; all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.