Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935279›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2022

Diagnostic Value of Next-Generation Sequencing in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review.

Yuchen Tang, Dacheng Zhao, Shenghong Wang, Qiong Yi, Yayi Xia, Bin Geng

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Osteomyelitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostic performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing and conventional microbial culture for spinal infection: a retrospective comparative study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuchen Tang *Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Orthopaedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-6319
Dacheng Zhao *Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Orthopaedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Shenghong WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Orthopaedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Qiong YiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Orthopaedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Yayi XiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Orthopaedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Bin GengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Orthopaedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
Lanzhou University Second Hospital · CN

Funding

Cuiying Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital CY2017-ZD02National Natural Science Foundation of China 81874017National Natural Science Foundation of China 81960403National Natural Science Foundation of China 82060405Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province of China 20JR5RA320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has developed rapidly in the last decade and is emerging as a promising diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, its diagnostic value for PJI is still uncertain. This systematic review aimed to explore the diagnostic value of NGS for PJI and verify its accuracy for culture-negative PJI patients. We conducted this systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify diagnostic technique studies evaluating the accuracy of NGS in the diagnosis of PJI. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated for each article. The detection rate of NGS for culture-negative PJI patients or PJI patients with antibiotic administration history was also calculated. Of the 87 identified citations, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of NGS ranged from 63% to 96% and 73% to 100%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values ranged from 71% to 100% and 74% to 95%, respectively. The detection rate of NGS for culture-negative PJI patients in six studies was higher than 50% (range from 82% to 100%), while in three studies it was lower than 50% (range from 9% to 31%). Also, the detection rate of NGS for PJIs with antibiotic administration history ranged from 74.05% to 92.31%. In conclusion, this systematic review suggests that NGS may have the potential to be a new tool for the diagnosis of PJI and should be considered to be added to the portfolio of diagnostic procedures. Furthermore, NGS showed a favorable diagnostic accuracy for culture-negative PJI patients or PJI patients with antibiotic administration history. However, due to the small sample sizes of studies and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies, more research is needed to confirm or disprove these findings.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousProsthesis-Related InfectionsBiomarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersDiagnosisNext-generation sequencingPeriprosthetic joint infectionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34935279
PMCPMC8867422
OpenAlexW4200502765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.