Observational studyColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2022
ScotCap - A large observational cohort study.
Observational study in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06475560 (Camera Capsule Endoscopy in the Routine Diagnostic Pathway for Colorectal Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Camera Capsule Endoscopy in the Routine Diagnostic Pathway for Colorectal Diseases
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Follow-up endoscopy rates as an indicator of effectiveness in colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Routine Diagnostic Pathway for Colorectal Diseases (DanCap): Protocol for a Cluster-Allocated Crossover Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inter- and Intra-Observer Reliability for Colon Capsule CLEansing Assessment and Report.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Multicenter study of colon capsule endoscopy in post-polypectomy surveillance.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Expected Values of Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy Consortium Position Statement.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Re-investigation rate following colon capsule endoscopy stratified by faecal haemoglobin concentration in a screening population.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Letter: Assessing the True Filtering Effect of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Surveillance Cohorts.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Hologenomic analysis of rectal mucus sampling for detection of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Patient experience of colon capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a structured, comparative patient survey.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-Assisted Evaluation of Colon Cleanliness in Capsule Endoscopy Videos.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patient priorities and decision-making process when choosing between colonic investigation alternatives: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Factors predicting conversion from colon capsule endoscopy to conventional optical endoscopy-findings from the CESCAIL study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Multicentre Study of 10,369 Symptomatic Patients Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy, Colonoscopy and CT Colonography.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- The Future of Minimally Invasive GI and Capsule Diagnostics (REFLECT), October 2024.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unifying terminology, reporting, and bowel preparation standards in colon capsule endoscopy: Nyborg Consensus.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Colon capsule endoscopy today: Brief overview of leading UK and Danish initiatives.Endoscopy international open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe aim of this work was to evaluate the performance of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in a lower gastrointestinal diagnostic care pathway.
methodThis large multicentre prospective clinical evaluation recruited symptomatic patients (patients requiring investigation of symptoms suggestive of colorectal pathology) and surveillance patients (patients due to undergo surveillance colonoscopy). Patients aged 18 years or over were invited to participate and undergo CCE by a secondary-care clinician if they met the referral criteria for a colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the test completion rate (visualization of the whole colon and rectum). We also measured the need for further tests after CCE.
resultsA total of 733 patients were invited to take part in this evaluation, with 509 patients undergoing CCE. Of these, 316 were symptomatic patients and 193 were surveillance patients. Two hundred and twenty-eight of the 316 symptomatic patients (72%) and 137 of the 193 surveillance patients (71%) had a complete test. It was found that 118/316 (37%) of symptomatic patients required no further test following CCE, while 103/316 (33%) and 81/316 (26%) required a colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, respectively. Fifty-three of the 193 surveillance patients (28%) required no further test following CCE, while 104/193 (54%) and 30/193 (16%) required a colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, respectively. No patient in this evaluation was diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Two patients experienced serious adverse events - one capsule retention with obstruction and one hospital admission with dehydration due to the bowel preparation.
conclusionCCE is a safe, well-tolerated diagnostic test which can reduce the proportion of patients requiring colonoscopy, but the test completion rate needs to be improved to match that of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.