Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935160›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2022

A propensity score-matched, real-world comparison of ustekinumab vs vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease. The Cross Pennine study II.

Marco Vincenzo Lenti, Vivien Dolby, Tanya Clark, Veronica Hall, Suzanne Tattersall, Francesca Fairhurst, Catherine Kenneth, Rachael Walker, Karen Kemp, Simon Borg-Bartolo and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative risk ofTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Second-Line Biologic Therapy Following Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Failure: A Real-World Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Vincenzo LentiLeeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-4911
Vivien DolbyLeeds, UK.
Tanya ClarkLeeds, UK.
Veronica HallBolton, UK.
Suzanne TattersallBolton, UK.
Francesca FairhurstBolton, UK.
Catherine KennethBradford, UK.
Rachael WalkerBradford, UK.
Karen KempManchester, UK.
Simon Borg-BartoloManchester, UK.
Jimmy K LimdiManchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-6251
Jo TaylorManchester, UK.
Tristan TownsendLiverpool, UK.
Sree SubramanianLiverpool, UK.
Daniel StoreyLiverpool, UK.
Arash AssadsangabiSalford, UK.
Catherine StansfieldSalford, UK.
Paul SmithWigan, UK.
Debra ByrneWigan, UK.
Annalisa De SilvestriPavia, Italy.
Christian P SelingerLeeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2022-5859
Bolton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Salford · GBWrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal choice of biological agents after failure of anti-tumour-necrosis-factor-(TNF)α agent in Crohn's disease (CD) is yet to be defined.

aimsTo assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab compared to vedolizumab as second-line treatment in CD patients who failed anti-TNFα therapy.

methodsRetrospective analysis of clinical response and remission at 14 and 52 weeks to ustekinumab by physician global assessment (PGA). A propensity score-matched analysis with a cohort treated with vedolizumab was performed.

resultsOf 282 patients (mean age 40 ± 15, F:M ratio 1.7:1) treated with ustekinumab, clinical response or remission was reached by 200/282 patients (70.9%) at 14 weeks, and 162/259 patients (62.5%) at 52 weeks. Overall, 74 adverse events occurred, of which 26 were labelled as serious (8.3 per 100 person-year). After exclusion of patients without prior anti-TNFα exposure and patients previously exposed to vedolizumab or ustekinumab, we analysed 275/282 patients (97.5%) on ustekinumab and 118/135 patients (87.4%) on vedolizumab. Propensity score analysis revealed that at 14 weeks, patients treated with ustekinumab were 38% (95% CI 25%-50%; P < 0.001) more likely to achieve clinical remission, while at 52 weeks, the difference of 9% (95% CI -15% to 33%; P = 0.462) was not significant.

conclusionsUstekinumab was effective and well tolerated in this real-world cohort. While ustekinumab proved more effective at 14-weeks, we found no statistically significant differences at 52 weeks compared to vedolizumab.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseUstekinumabAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedUstekinumabvedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID34935160
PMCPMC9305775
OpenAlexW4200412501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.