Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935099›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2022

Editorial: Comparison of antibody and T cell responses elicited by BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in healthy adult humans.

Veronica Galvan, Jorge Quarleri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Veronica GalvanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Jorge QuarleriInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Retrovirus y Sida (INBIRS), Facultad de Medicina, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. quarleri@fmed.uba.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5110-8773
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AROklahoma City VA Health Care System · US

Funding

Visualizing insulin actions on neuronal metabolism and function using fluorescent biosensorsP20GM125528 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Veronica Galvan, William Edmund Sonntag · 2019 to 2026
$17.8M
Targeted DNA Methylation and Mitochondrial Heteroplasmy CoreP30AG050911 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Matthew John Hart · 2015 to 2026
$13.9M
BLRD VA I01 BX002211BLRD VA IK6 BX006026NIA NIH HHS P30 AG050911NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine development has become the main tool for reducing COVID-19 cases and the severity of the disease. Comparative analyses of adaptive immunity generated by different vaccines platforms are urgently needed. Multiple studies have compared different vaccines using similar platforms; however, comparative analyses of vaccines across different platforms are lacking. This Editorial provides a summary and commentary on the main findings reported in the observational and longitudinal study by Vályi-Nagy et al. (Geroscience 43:2321) that compared the adaptive (humoral and T cell-mediated) immune responses elicited by Sinopharm and BNT162b2 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 virus among 57 healthy adult Hungarian volunteers.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansLongitudinal StudiesT-LymphocytesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34935099
PMCPMC8691152
OpenAlexW4200229810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.