Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935096›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Fast quantification of extracellular vesicles levels in early breast cancer patients by Single Molecule Detection Array (SiMoA).

Carlo Morasso, Alessandra Ricciardi, Daisy Sproviero, Marta Truffi, Sara Albasini, Francesca Piccotti, Federico Sottotetti, Ludovica Mollica, Cristina Cereda, Luca Sorrentino and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carlo Morasso *Laboratory of Nanomedicine, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandra Ricciardi *Laboratory of Nanomedicine, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Daisy SprovieroGenomic and Post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Marta TruffiLaboratory of Nanomedicine, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Sara AlbasiniBreast Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca PiccottiLaboratory of Nanomedicine, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Federico SottotettiMedical Oncology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Ludovica MollicaMedical Oncology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Cristina CeredaGenomic and Post-Genomic Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Luca SorrentinoColorectal Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Fabio CorsiBreast Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy. fabio.corsi@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6469-4086
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITCenter for Genomic Science · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreliminary reports suggest that extracellular vesicles (EVs) might be a promising biomarker for breast cancer (BC). However, the quantification of plasmatic levels of EVs is a complex task. To overcome these limitations, we developed a new, fast, and easy to use assay for the quantification of EVs directly in plasma based on the use of Single-Molecule Array (SiMoA).

methodsBy using SiMoA to identify CD9+/CD63+ EVs, we analyzed plasma samples of 181 subjects (95 BC and 86 healthy controls, HC). A calibration curve, made of a serial dilution of lyophilized standards from human plasma, was used in each run to ensure the obtainment of quantitative results from the assay. In a subgroup of patients, EVs concentrations were estimated in plasma before and after 30 days from cancer surgery. Additional information on the size of EVs were also acquired using a Nanosight system to obtain a clearer understanding of the mechanism underlying the releases of EVs associated with the presence of cancer.

resultsThe measured levels of EVs resulted significantly higher in BC patients (median values 1179.1 ng/µl vs 613.0 ng/µl, p < 0.0001). ROC curve was used to define the optimal cut-off level of the test at 1034.5 ng/µl with an AUC of 0.75 [95% CI 0.68-0.82]. EVs plasmatic concentrations significantly decreased after cancer surgery compared to baseline values (p = 0.014). No correlation was found between EVs concentration and clinical features of BC.

conclusionSiMoA assay allows plasmatic EVs levels detection directly without any prior processing. EVs levels are significantly higher in BC patients and significantly decreases after cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsExtracellular VesiclesBiomarkersFemaleHumansROC CurveBiomarkersBiomarkerBreast cancerExtracellular vesiclesImmunoassaySiMoATetraspanins

Identifiers

PMID34935096
PMCPMC8841315
OpenAlexW4200451625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.