Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34935051›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2022

Pericyte‑derived extracellular vesicles‑mimetic nanovesicles improves peripheral nerve regeneration in mouse models of sciatic nerve transection.

Guo Nan Yin, Tae Young Shin, Jiyeon Ock, Min-Ji Choi, Anita Limanjaya, Mi-Hye Kwon, Fang-Yuan Liu, Soon-Sun Hong, Ju-Hee Kang, Yong Song Gho and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guo Nan YinDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Tae Young ShinDepartment of Urology, Ewha Woman's University School of Medicine, Seoul 07804, Republic of Korea.
Jiyeon OckDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Min-Ji ChoiDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Anita LimanjayaDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Hye KwonDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Fang-Yuan LiuDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Soon-Sun HongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Program in Biomedical Science and Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Hee KangDepartment of Pharmacology and Medicinal Toxicology Research Center, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Yong Song GhoDepartment of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeongsangbuk‑do 37673, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Kyu SuhDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Kan RyuDepartment of Urology and National Research Center for Sexual Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Inha University · KREwha Womans University · KRPohang University of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericyte‑derived extracellular vesicle‑mimetic nanovesicles (PC‑NVs) play an important role in the improvement of erectile function after cavernous nerve injury. However, the impact of PC‑NVs on the peripheral nervous system (PNS), such as the sciatic nerve, is unclear. In this study, PC‑NVs were isolated from mouse cavernous pericytes (MCPs). A sciatic nerve transection (SNT) model was established using 8‑week‑old C57BL/6J mice. The sciatic nerve was harvested 5 and 14 days for immunofluorescence and western blot studies. Function studies were evaluated by performing the rotarod test and walking track analysis. The results demonstrated that PC‑NVs could stimulate endothelial cells, increase neuronal cell content, and increase macrophage and Schwann cell presence at the proximal stump rather than the distal stump in the SNT model, thereby improving angiogenesis and nerve regeneration in the early stage of sciatic nerve regeneration. In addition, PC‑NVs also increased the expression of neurotrophic factors (brain‑derived nerve growth factor, neurotrophin‑3 and nerve growth factor) and the activity of the cell survival signaling pathway (PI3K/Akt signaling), and reduced the activity of the JNK signaling pathway. Additionally, after 8 weeks of local application of PC‑NVs in SNT model mice, their motor and sensory functions were significantly improved, as assessed by performing the rotarod test and walking track analysis. In conclusion, the present study showed that the significant improvement of neurovascular regeneration in mice following treatment with PC‑NVs may provide a favorable strategy for promoting motor and sensory regeneration and functional recovery of the PNS.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExtracellular VesiclesMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesNerve RegenerationPericytesSchwann CellsSciatic NerveSignal TransductionSurvival Analysisangiogenesisendothelial cellextracellular vesiclemacrophagenanovesicleneurotrophic factorneurovascular regenerationpericytesperipheral nervous systemsciatic nerve transection

Identifiers

PMID34935051
PMCPMC8711595
OpenAlexW4200529923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.