ArticleFaraday discussions2022
Nanostructured carbon-fiber surfaces for improved neurochemical detection.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovating carbon-based electrodes for direct neurochemical detection along the brain-immune axis.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2025Article
- Surface-Roughened Graphene Oxide Microfibers Enhance Electrochemical Reversibility.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024Article
- Waste Coffee Ground-Derived Porous Carbon for Neurochemical Detection.ACS sensors · 2024Article
- Editors' Choice-Review-The Future of Carbon-Based Neurochemical Sensing: A Critical Perspective.ECS sensors plus · 2023Review
- Wet-Spun Porous Carbon Microfibers for Enhanced Electrochemical Detection.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Surface Nanostructure Effects on Dopamine Adsorption and Electrochemistry on Glassy Carbon Electrodes.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2022Article
- Perspective-Electrochemical Sensors for Neurotransmitters and Psychiatrics: Steps toward Physiological Mental Health Monitoring.Journal of the Electrochemical Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fundamental insight into the extent to which the nanostructured surface and geometry impacts neurochemical interactions at electrode surfaces could provide significant advances in our ability to design and fabricate ultrasensitive neurochemical detection probes. Here, we investigate the extent to which the nanostructure of the carbon-fiber surface impacts detection of catecholamines and purines with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV). Carbon-fibers were treated with argon (Ar) plasma to induce variations in the nano- and micro-structure without changing the functionalization of the surface. We tested variations in topology by measuring the extent to which the flow rate, RF power, and treatment time affect the surface roughness. Flow rates from 50-100 sccm, plasma power from 20-100 W, and treatment times from 30 s to 5 min were compared. Two Ar-treatments were chosen from the optimization studies for comparison, and the surface roughness was evaluated using atomic force microscopy (AFM). To ensure no changes in chemical composition, fibers were analyzed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). On average, at the optimized Ar-plasma treatment procedure, oxidative current for adenosine and ATP increased by 3.5 ± 1.4-fold and 3.2 ± 0.6-fold, and guanosine and GTP by 1.7 ± 0.3-fold and 1.8 ± 0.3-fold, respectively (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.