Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934995›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2021

Sex differences in post cardiac arrest discharge locations.

Vincent Jeanselme, Maria De-Arteaga, Jonathan Elmer, Sarah M Perman, Artur Dubrawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intelligent Clinical Decision Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent JeanselmeCarnegie Mellon University, Auton Lab, Pittsburgh, USA.
Maria De-ArteagaUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Jonathan ElmerUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
Sarah M PermanUniversity of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
Artur DubrawskiCarnegie Mellon University, Auton Lab, Pittsburgh, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe explored sex-based differences in discharge location after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective cohort study including patients hospitalized after resuscitation from cardiac arrest from January 2010 to May 2020. We identified patients from a prospective registry, from which we extracted standard demographic and clinical variables. We explored favorable discharge location, defined as discharge to home or acute rehabilitation for survivors to hospital discharge. We tested the association of sex with the residuals of a multivariable logistic regression built using bidirectional selection to control for clinically relevant covariates.

resultsWe included 2,278 patients. Mean age was 59 (SD 16), 40% were women, and 77% were admitted after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A total of 970 patients (43%) survived to discharge; of those, 607 (63% of survivors) had a favorable discharge location. Female sex showed a weak independent association with unfavorable discharge location (adjusted OR 0.94 (95%CI 0.89-0.99)).

conclusionsOur results suggest a possible sex-based disparity in discharge location after cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

BiasCardiac arrestSex

Identifiers

PMID34934995
PMCPMC8654620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.