Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934981›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2021

Infertility treatment and the risk of small for gestational age births: a population-based study in the United States.

Haley N Glatthorn, Mark V Sauer, Justin S Brandt, Cande V Ananth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haley N GlatthornDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Mark V SauerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Justin S BrandtDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Cande V AnanthDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association between infertility treatments and small for gestational age (SGA) births.

designCross-sectional study.

settingUnited States, 2015-2019. PATIENTS: Women (n = 16,836,228) who delivered nonmalformed, singleton live births (24-44 weeks' gestation).

interventionsAny infertility treatment, including assisted reproductive technology (ART) and prescribed fertility-enhancing medications.

main outcome measuresSmall for gestational age birth, defined as sex-specific birth weight <10% for gestational age. Associations between SGA and infertility treatment were derived from Poisson regression with robust variance. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived after adjusting for confounders. In a sensitivity analysis, we corrected for nondifferential exposure misclassification and unmeasured confounding biases.

resultsSubsequently, 1.4% (n = 231,177) of pregnancies resulted from infertility treatments (0.8% ART and 0.6% fertility-enhancing medications). Of these, SGA births occurred in 9.4% (n = 21,771) and 11.9% (n = 1,755,925) of pregnancies conceived with infertility treatment and naturally conceived pregnancies, respectively (adjusted RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06, 1.08). However, after correction for misclassification bias and unmeasured confounding, infertility treatment was associated with a 27% reduced risk of SGA (bias-corrected RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53, 0.85). Similar trends were seen for analyses stratified by exposure to ART and fertility-enhancing medications, as well as for SGA <5th and <3rd percentiles.

conclusionsExposure to infertility treatment is associated with a reduced risk of SGA births. These findings, which are contrary to some published reports, may reflect changes in the modern practice of infertility care, maternal lifestyle, and compliance with prenatal care within the infertile population. Until these findings are corroborated, the associations must be cautiously interpreted.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologyInfertilitymisclassification biassmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID34934981
PMCPMC8655429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.