ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2021
Iatrogenic Aortic Root Injury from Coronary Interventions: Early and Follow-up CT Imaging Findings.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Clinical and imaging differences between Stanford Type B intramural hematoma-like lesions and classic aortic dissection.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic injury represents a rare but potentially fatal complication of invasive coronary angiography. The authors present a series of four patients with aortic injury after invasive coronary angiography and intervention (mean age, 71 years; three women). In three patients, CT showed subintimal staining from undiluted contrast media (CM) in the aortic root with no communication to the aortic lumen. Short-term follow-up CT showed resolution of CM staining in all patients. Classic aortic dissection occurred in one patient, with undiluted CM from invasive angiography in the false lumen in the aortic root. Preliminary evidence suggests that iatrogenic injury from invasive coronary angiography resulting in subintimal CM staining of the aortic wall at CT, without evidence of communication with the lumen of the aortic root, shows favorable short-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.