ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2021
Spinal cord infarction and peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case series.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal cord ischemia in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Spinal Cord Infarction as a Complication of VA-ECMO With Microaxial Flow Pump in Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- In patients supported with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, what factors are associated with the development of spinal cord ischaemia?Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Successful pharmaco-invasive approach using a lower alteplase dose and VA-ECMO support in high-risk pulmonary embolism: case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Mortality in ASIA Impairment Scale grade A to D Patients With Odontoid Fracture and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence of Spinal Cord Injury.Neurotrauma reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is increasingly utilized in patients with cardiogenic shock due to improved technology and outcomes. Peripheral VA ECMO offers several advantages over central ECMO and is becoming increasingly popular. However, when configured via the femoral vessels, retrograde flow to the descending aorta and arch of aorta competes with antegrade ventricular output and can be associated with a watershed phenomenon and increased risk of neurologic and visceral injury. CASE SUMMARY: In this case series, we report three patients who were supported with peripheral VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock. All three were successfully weaned from peripheral VA ECMO; however, they had developed bilateral lower limb paralysis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed spinal cord infarction in all three patients. All patients subsequently succumbed to multiorgan failure and did not survive to hospital discharge. DISCUSSION: The use of mechanical circulatory support, in particular, peripheral ECMO, has escalated with advances in technology, better understanding of cardiac physiology and improving outcomes. Spinal cord infarction is a rare but serious complication of peripheral VA ECMO support with only a few case reports published. Further studies are needed to identify the exact cause and prevention of this rare but often terminal complication. Through this series of three patients supported on peripheral VA ECMO complicated by spinal cord infarction, we review previously published reports, analyse possible mechanisms, and propose alternate management strategies to be considered in patients at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.