ArticlePediatric quality & safety
"First Five" Quality Improvement Program Increases Adherence and Continuity with Well-child Care.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American Academy of Pediatrics Bright Futures recommends routine well-child care as optimal care for children. This quality improvement project aimed to increase adherence to the "First Five" visits after newborn follow-up at 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months-by 25% (50% or higher) and continuity with providers by 20% (64% or higher) between 2013 and 2016.
methodsRetrospective data collection identified a quality gap, in which only 25% had the required well-child visits by the first year. We interviewed parents/caregivers of 12- to 15-month-old children for their perspectives on access to care, scheduling, and the medical home concept. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles targeted modification of electronic medical record templates, scheduling, staff and parental education, standardization of work processes, and birth to 1-year age-specific incentives. We then piloted interventions in one of our clinic's pod/subgroup. Process and outcome measures were analyzed using descriptive statistics, a run chart, and a 2-sample % Defective Test.
resultsParent/caregiver interviews revealed that only 6% knew what a medical home was, and only 40% "almost always saw the same provider for care." At baseline in 2012, we documented completion of all 5 visits in only 25% of the children; <10% of those children had consecutive visits with the same provider. After multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and pilot, our "First Five" well-child care adherence rose to 78%, and continuity increased to 74% in 2018 (
conclusionA multifaceted, evidence-based approach improved both well-child care adherence and provider continuity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.