ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
Evaluation of Threshold Dose of Damaged Hepatic Tissue After Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy Using Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation study on accuracy of our newly proposed methods for post-therapeutic liver reserve capacity estimation utilizingAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing treatment accuracy of image-guided liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: a quantitative analysis based on 4D CT through post-therapeutic MRI-morphologic alterations.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the threshold dose and associated factors using signal-intensity changes in the irradiated area after carbon-ion radiation therapy (C-ion RT) for patients with liver cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated for the first time with C-ion RT for malignant liver tumors and followed up with 3-Tesla gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 3 months after treatment completion were retrospectively enrolled. The volume of focal liver reaction (FLR), a low-intensity area in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA after treatment, was measured. Corrected FLR (cFLR) volume, defined as FLR corrected for changes in tumor volume from before to after treatment, was calculated, and the threshold dose was determined by applying the cFLR volume in the dose-volume histogram. To evaluate potential mismatch in fusion images of planning computed tomography and follow-up MRI, the concordance coefficient (CC) was measured, and patients with a CC < 0.7 were excluded. Sixty patients were included. Multiple regression analysis was performed with the threshold dose as the objective variable and the age, dose, number of fractionations, Child-Pugh score, pretreatment liver volume, and pretreatment tumor volume as explanatory variables. The Student
resultsThe median threshold doses for each number of dose fractionations (4 fractions, 12 fractions, and overall) were 51.6, 51.9, and 51.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]), respectively, in patients categorized as Child-Pugh class A and 27.0, 28.8, and 27.0 Gy (RBE), respectively, in patients categorized as Child-Pugh class B. In the multiple-regression analysis, only the Child-Pugh score was significant (
conclusionsAlthough few patients in the study had decreased liver function, baseline liver function was the only factor significantly associated with the median threshold dose. These findings facilitate appropriate patient selection to receive C-ion RT for malignant hepatic tumors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.