Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934812›Full record

ReviewClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2019

Mass spectrometry for therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-tuberculosis drugs.

Johanna Kuhlin, Marieke G G Sturkenboom, Samiksha Ghimire, Ioana Margineanu, Simone H J van den Elsen, Noviana Simbar, Onno W Akkerman, Erwin M Jongedijk, Remco A Koster, Judith Bruchfeld and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Standards for clinical trials for treating TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical standards for drug-susceptible pulmonary TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Clinical standards for the dosing and management of TB drugs.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna KuhlinUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marieke G G SturkenboomUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Samiksha GhimireUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ioana MargineanuUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Simone H J van den ElsenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Noviana SimbarUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Onno W AkkermanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erwin M JongedijkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Remco A KosterPRA Health Sciences Bioanalytical Laboratory, Assen, The Netherlands.
Judith BruchfeldUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daan J TouwUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem C AlffenaarUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) uses drug concentrations, primarily from plasma, to optimize drug dosing. Optimisation of drug dosing may improve treatment outcomes, reduce toxicity and reduce the risk of acquired drug resistance. The aim of this narrative review is to outline and discuss the challenges of developing multi-analyte assays for anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) by reviewing the existing literature in the field. Compared to other analytical methods, LC-MS/MS offers higher sensitivity and selectivity while requiring relatively low sample volumes. Additionally, multi-analyte assays are easier to perform since adequate separation and short run times are possible even when non-selective sample preparation techniques are used. However, challenges still exist, especially when optimizing LC separation techniques for assays that include analytes with differing chemical properties. Here, we have identified seven multi-analyte assays for first-line anti-TB drugs that use various solvents for sample preparation and mobile phase separation. Only two multi-analyte assays for second-line anti-TB drugs were identified (including either nine or 20 analytes), with each using different protein precipitation methods, mobile phases and columns. The 20 analyte assay did not include bedaquiline, delamanid, meropenem or imipenem. For these drugs, other assays with similar methodologies were identified that could be incorporated in the development of a future comprehensive multi-analyte assay. TDM is a powerful methodology for monitoring patient's individual treatments in TB programmes, but its implementation will require different approaches depending on available resources. Since TB is most-prevalent in low- and middle-income countries where resources are scarce, a patient-centred approach using sampling methods other than large volume blood draws, such as dried blood spots or saliva collection, could facilitate its adoption and use. Regardless of the methodology of collection and analysis, it will be critical that laboratory proficiency programmes are in place to ensure adequate quality control. It is our intent that the information contained in this review will contribute to the process of assembling comprehensive multiplexed assays for the dynamic monitoring of anti-TB drug treatment in affected individuals.

Indexed as

ADR, acquired drug resistanceDBS, dried blood spotsDS-TB, drug-susceptible tuberculosisEMA, European Medicines AgencyFDA, Food and Drug AdministrationHILIC, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographyHPLC, high performance liquid chromatographyLC-MS/MSLC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometryLiquid chromatographyMDR-TB, multidrug-resistant tuberculosisMTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosisMulti-analyte assaysSIL-IS, stable isotopically labelled-internal standardsTB, tuberculosisTDMTDM, therapeutic drug monitoringTuberculosisUHPLC-UV, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-ultra violet detectionWHO, World Health Organisation

Identifiers

PMID34934812
PMCPMC8653513
OpenAlexW2898049219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.