Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934789›Full record

ArticleData in brief2021

Scalp EEG recordings of pediatric epilepsy patients: A dataset for automatic detection of interictal epileptiform discharges from routine EEG.

Fasil Ok, Rajesh R, Rajith K Ravindren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fasil OkDepartment of Computer Science, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Rajesh RDepartment of Computer Science, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Rajith K RavindrenInstitute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) in routine EEG is crucial evidence of epilepsy in one patient. Though some studies have reported on automated detection of IEDs, the availability of open benchmark datasets for evaluating these methods is limited. This article presents a scalp EEG dataset of pediatric epilepsy patients. The dataset contains 19 channel EEG recordings of 21 subjects who are advised to undergo routine EEG tests to diagnose epilepsy. Among these 21 subjects, IEDs are found in EEG recordings of 11 subjects as confirmed by neurologists. The routine EEG recordings of the remaining 10 subjects are free from IEDs. A 32 channel EEG machine is used to record the routine EEG, and an international 10-20 electrode placement system is used to place the electrodes on the subject's scalp. A longitudinal bipolar montage channel configuration is used to collect the signals. IEDs present in routine EEG of epileptic patients are annotated by a neuro-technician and are provided with the dataset. The raw EEG data is further segmented into 10 s epochs based on the annotations for easy analysis and validation in automated IED detection systems. These 10 s epochs are also included in the dataset. The dataset is very useful for modeling novel automated IED detection systems that reduce the burdens of neurologists or neurophysiologists. In addition, the usability of the proposed dataset has also been experimented on a model based on exponential energy and support vector machine. The classification performance of the model indicates that the proposed dataset can be used as a benchmark dataset for automated IED detection.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEpilepsy detectionInterictal epileptiform dischargesPediatric epilepsy patientsRoutine EEG data

Identifiers

PMID34934789
PMCPMC8661461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.