ReviewCureus2021
Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in the Cervical Spine.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Acupotomy Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy for Cervical Medial Branch Injections at C3-C6: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Accuracy of Ultrasound Guided Injections in the Treatment of Cervical Facet Joint Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Visibility of Prevertebral Soft Tissues in the Neck Using Ultrasonography: A Feasibility Study.International journal of spine surgery · 2023Article
- Direct Visualization of Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Injections Using Sonography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical pain is a common symptom among the general population. When conservative strategies fail to provide pain relief, cervical spine injections may be considered. Compared with cervical surgery, cervical injections have low major complications and, with the right indication, have demonstrated good results. Traditionally, these types of procedures have been performed under fluoroscopy; however, in recent years, ultrasound has become a more common imaging modality to guide spinal injections. Although ultrasound presents an excellent quality image for soft tissue and allows the observation of vascular tissues, nerves, and the contour of bone surfaces, the cervical region has a complicated neurovascular network and a comprehensive understanding of the cervical sonoanatomy should remain as the basis before one can plan cervical ultrasound-guided intervention. This paper aims to show the advantages of ultrasound in facilitating the performance of cervical spine procedures, including facet joint injections, medial branch blocks, and selective nerve root blocks; analyze the sonoanatomy and landmarks of commonly intervened cervical structures; and illustrate how these procedures can be performed safely and precisely under ultrasound guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.