Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934346›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

Family Physician's Educational Interview with Patients Helps in Early Recognition of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

Ana Lesac Brizić, Vladimir Mozetič

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana Lesac BrizićCommunity Health Center of Primorje - Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-8316-5246
Vladimir MozetičCommunity Health Center of Primorje - Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-5165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) can have an etiology outside the lower urinary tract (LUT) and are therefore an important diagnostic indicator for assessing the overall health of a person. However, LUTS is still mainly neglected by primary health care providers as well as by patients. In this study, we assessed the importance of an educational interview (EI) conducted by a GP on the patients' ability to recognize LUTS. We also investigated other factors that affect the recognition of LUTS: subjects' personal educational level, number of LUT symptoms and their bothersome level on a scale 0-10. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in Croatia (2018-2020) by interviewing 499 subjects. We compared recognized LUT symptoms before and after the EI and determined whether their number, their bothersome level, or the subjects' personal educational level were associated with LUTS recognition.

resultsEI significantly improved the ability to recognize LUTS (p=0.001). The number of LUT symptoms and bothersome level in subjects before EI was much greater than the number in subjects after EI (p<0.0001, mean>4 and p<0.0001, median>8, respectively). Subjects with higher educational level recognized LUTS with fewer symptoms after the EI (p<0.01), but no difference was observed among subjects who recognized LUTS before the EI.

conclusionFor subjects to recognize LUTS, their condition had to be severe - more than 4 symptoms and bothersome level >8/10. Personal educational level had little impact on LUTS recognition. However, an EI proved to be an excellent tool for raising awareness about LUTS and its early recognition.

Indexed as

doctor–patient relationshiphealth promotionlower urinary tract symptomspatient educationprimary carequality of care

Identifiers

PMID34934346
PMCPMC8684385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.