ReviewPatient preference and adherence2021
Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment - A Systematic Review.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identification and synthesis of end-of-life decision-making measures: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinician Considerations Regarding Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.JAMA surgery · 2026Article
- Measures used to evaluate psychosocial interventions in dementia care: A narrative review and synthesis.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Review
- Article
- Improving Access to Cognitive Interventions for People With Dementia in Australian Community-Based Settings.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Review
- Patient Preferences for Dementia Interventions: A Scoping Review With a Systematic Review of Medications and Choice-Based Methods.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Medical professionals' perspectives and experiences in disclosing a dementia diagnosis: a grounded theory study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Risk of depression after new-onset dementia or cognitive impairment: the Health and Retirement Study.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Association between environmental mold exposure and mild cognitive impairment in older adults: a case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of Dementia Patients Caregivers' Home Safety Knowledge in the Outpatient Setting of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Reimagining U.S. social care policy: a commentary on Medicaid strategies to better support individuals with dementia.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Measuring dementia caregiving styles to improve person-centered care.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Health and Quality of Life in Nursing Homes: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study on the Impact of Leadership and Person-Centred Care.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Impact of dementia-landscaped therapy garden on psychological well-being- A pilot study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- General practitioner and practice nurses perspectives on implementation of the 75+ health assessment: Implications for dementia care and well-being.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Commentary: Ethics and Advance Requests for MAiD: Thresholds and Applicability.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2025Article
- Assessing Cognition in Kidney Failure Using Virtual Reality Technology: A Clinical Research Protocol.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- A modified transactional model of stress and coping on depressive symptoms among informal caregivers of persons with dementia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Social Media Programs for Outreach and Recruitment Supporting Aging and Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias Research: Longitudinal Descriptive Study.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge about the priorities and preferences of people living with dementia (PwD) might help to individualize treatment, care, and support, which could improve patient-related outcomes. This study aimed to summarize preferences of PwD or people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), considering all relevant aspects of health care and everyday life.
methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review and included studies about patient preferences published in English between January 1, 1990 and October 28, 2019. The inclusion criteria were that preferences were elicited directly by PwD or patients with MCI. We used the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Management value set for dementia to categorize the preferences into the following topics: a) clinical status, b) symptoms, functioning, and quality of life, and c) sustainability of care.
resultsOf 578 initially identified studies, 45 met the inclusion criteria. Patients preferred to be informed about the diagnosis as early as possible, especially for anticipatory care planning. They ranked caregiver quality of life as their highest priority. They preferred not to be a burden to others more than their caregivers' mood, their own functional status, or their own distressing behaviors. Furthermore, PwD are eager to participate in medical decisions, especially in those about creating an everyday life routine. PwD preferred their own quality of life, self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. Institutionalized PwD preferred individualized and person-centered care. According to the sustainability of care, PwD preferred to maintain close bonds with their family at the end of their life and wanted to be treated with empathy.
conclusionThis systematic review provides essential insights into cognitively impaired patients' preferences, which are rarely considered in treatment, care, and support services. Further studies should evaluate whether considering preferences in treatment and care or daily living can improve patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.