Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934122›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2021

Bifurcation functional significance score as predictor of mortality: a validating study.

Dobrin Vassilev, Niya Mileva, Carlos Collet, Pavel Nikolov, Katerina Sokolova, Kiril Karamfiloff, Vladimir Naunov, Jeroen Sonck, Gianluca Rigatelli, Ghassan S Kassab and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Dobrin VassilevCardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria. dobrinv@gmail.com.
Niya MilevaCardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria. nmileva91@gmail.com.
Carlos ColletCardiovascular Center OLV Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Pavel NikolovCardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Katerina SokolovaCardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Kiril KaramfiloffCardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Vladimir NaunovCardiology Department, Medical University Sofia, "Alexandrovska" University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Jeroen SonckCardiovascular Center OLV Ziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Gianluca RigatelliSection of Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Ghassan S KassabCalifornia Medical Innovations Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
Robert J GilMossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland.
Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BECalifornia Medical Innovations Institute · USMossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Rovigo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of coronary bifurcation stenosis. Anatomical characteristics of the vessel and lesion, however, fail to give information about the functional significance of the bifurcation stenosis. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that systematically establishes the baseline functional significance of coronary stenosis and its effect on procedural and clinical outcomes. Patients with significant angiographic bifurcation lesions defined as diameter stenosis > 50% in main vessel and/or side branch were included. FFR was performed in main vessel (MV) and side branch (SB) before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 169 patients from Fiesta study (derivation cohort) and 555 patients from prospective bifurcation registry (clinical effect cohort) were analyzed to validate angiographic prediction score (BFSS) used to determine the potentially functional significance of coronary bifurcation stenosis. Bifurcation functional significance score (including the following parameters-SYNTAX ≥ 11, SB/MB BARI score, MV %DS ≥ 55%, main branch (MB) %DS ≥ 65%, lesion length ≥ 25 mm) with a maximum value of 11 was developed. A cut-off value of 6.0 was shown to give the best discriminatory ability-with accuracy 87% (sensitivity 77%, specificity 96%, p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in all-cause mortality between patients with BFSS ≥ 6.0 vs. BFSS < 6.0-25.5% vs. 18.4%, log-rank p = 0.001 as well as cardiac mortality: BFSS ≥ 6.0 vs. BFSS < 6.0-17.7% vs. 14.5%, log-rank (p = 0.016). The cardiac mortality was significantly lower in patients with smaller absolute SB territory, p = 0.023. An angiographic score (BFSS) with good discriminatory ability to determine the functional significance of coronary bifurcation stenosis was developed. The value for BFSS ≥ 6.0 can be used as a discriminator to define groups with higher risk for all-cause and cardiac mortality. Also, we found that the smaller side branches pose greater mortality risk.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesRegistriesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34934122
PMCPMC8692595
OpenAlexW4200145492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.