Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934056›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2021

Robot-assisted surgery in space: pros and cons. A review from the surgeon's point of view.

Desirè Pantalone, Giulia Satu Faini, Francesca Cialdai, Elettra Sereni, Stefano Bacci, Daniele Bani, Marco Bernini, Carlo Pratesi, PierLuigi Stefàno, Lorenzo Orzalesi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Surgery for interplanetary space missions.The British journal of surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Space surgery: a SAGES' white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Surgery in the Next Space Missions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Desirè PantaloneDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence (IT), Emergency SurgeryUnit- TraumaTeam, Emergency Dept-Careggi, University Hospital, Florence, Italy. desire.pantalone@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-104X
Giulia Satu FainiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Francesca CialdaiASAcampus joint laboratory, ASA Research Division, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Elettra SereniASAcampus joint laboratory, ASA Research Division, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Stefano BacciDepartment of Biology, Research Unit of Histology and Embriology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3651-229X
Daniele BaniDepartment of Experimental & Clinical Medicine, Section of Anatomy & Histology, Research Unit of Histology & Embryology - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Marco BerniniOncology Department, Breast Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Carlo PratesiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-University of Florence, Vascular Surgery Unit, Cardio -Thoracic and Vascular Dept-Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
PierLuigi StefànoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-University of Florence, Cardiovascular Surgery Unit. Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Dept -Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8338-3016
Lorenzo OrzalesiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Michele BalsamoKayser Italia srl, Livorno, Italy.
Valfredo ZolesiKayser Italia srl, Livorno, Italy.
Monica MoniciASAcampus joint laboratory, ASA Research Division, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITKayser (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The target of human flight in space has changed from permanence on the International Space Station to missions beyond low earth orbit and the Lunar Gateway for deep space exploration and Missions to Mars. Several conditions affecting space missions had to be considered: for example the effect of weightlessness and radiations on the human body, behavioral health decrements or communication latency, and consumable resupply. Telemedicine and telerobotic applications, robot-assisted surgery with some hints on experimental surgical procedures carried out in previous missions, had to be considered as well. The need for greater crew autonomy in health issues is related to the increasing severity of medical and surgical interventions that could occur in these missions, and the presence of a highly trained surgeon on board would be recommended. A surgical robot could be a valuable aid but only inasfar as it is provided with multiple functions, including the capability to perform certain procedures autonomously. Space missions in deep space or on other planets present new challenges for crew health. Providing a multi-function surgical robot is the new frontier. Research in this field shall be paving the way for the development of new structured plans for human health in space, as well as providing new suggestions for clinical applications on Earth.

Identifiers

PMID34934056
PMCPMC8692617
OpenAlexW4200545681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.