Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34934042›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2021

Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals the critical molecular pattern of UV-induced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Guorong Yan, Liang Li, Sibo Zhu, Yuhao Wu, Yeqiang Liu, Lude Zhu, Zijun Zhao, Fei Wu, Ning Jia, Caihe Liao and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Coixenolide Enhances Antitumor Immunity of Cytotoxic CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Functionalization of Nanomaterials for Skin Cancer Theranostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guorong Yan *Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-2959
Liang Li *Department of Dermatologic Surgery, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Sibo Zhu *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4800-8987
Yuhao WuInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yeqiang LiuDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-1390
Lude ZhuInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Zijun ZhaoInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Fei WuDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Ning JiaInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Caihe LiaoInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Long JiangDepartment of Dermatologic Surgery, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Qingyu ZengInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Peiru WangInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Lei ShiInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Zhe ZhengInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Shan FangInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Guolong ZhangInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. zglamu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-1361
Yichen TangDepartment of Dermatologic Surgery, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. tangyichen@medmail.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-2579
Xiuli WangInstitute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. wangxiuli_1400023@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0722-1274
Tongji University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common nonmelanoma skin cancer characterized by high invasiveness, heterogeneity, and mainly occurs in the ultraviolet (UV)-exposed regions of the skin, but its pathogenesis is still unclear. Here, we generated single-cell transcriptome profiles for 350 cells from six primary UV-induced cSCCs, together with matched adjacent skin samples, and three healthy control skin tissues by single-cell RNA-sequencing technology based on Smart-seq2 strategy. A series of bioinformatics analyses and in vitro experiments were used to decipher and validate the critical molecular pattern of cSCC. Results showed that cSCC cells and normal keratinocytes were significantly distinct in gene expression and chromosomal copy number variation. Furthermore, cSCC cells exhibited 18 hallmark pathways of cancer by gene set enrichment analysis. Differential expression analysis demonstrated that many members belonging to S100 gene family, SPRR gene family, and FABP5 were significantly upregulated in cSCC cells. Further experiments confirmed their upregulation and showed that S100A9 or FABP5 knockdown in cSCC cells inhibited their proliferation and migration through NF-κB pathway. Taken together, our data provide a valuable resource for deciphering the molecular pattern in UV-induced cSCC at a single-cell level and suggest that S100A9 and FABP5 may provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention of cSCC in the future.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overApoptosisCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansMaleSingle-Cell AnalysisSkin NeoplasmsTranscriptomeTransfectionTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34934042
PMCPMC8692455
OpenAlexW4200216468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.