Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34933973›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2021

Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool.

Scott Tschida, Ana Cordon, Gabriela Asturias, Mónica Mazariegos, María F Kroker-Lobos, Bianca Jackson, Peter Rohloff, David Flood

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Scott TschidaCenter for Research in Indigenous Health, Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán, Chimaltenango, Guatemala. scott.tschida@wuqukawoq.org.
Ana CordonCenter for Research in Indigenous Health, Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán, Chimaltenango, Guatemala.
Gabriela AsturiasCentre for Evidence-Based Development, Fundación Desarrolla Guatemala para la Educación y Salud (FUNDEGUA), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Mónica MazariegosINCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Calzada Roosevelt, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
María F Kroker-LobosINCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Calzada Roosevelt, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Bianca JacksonCenter for American Indian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter RohloffCenter for Research in Indigenous Health, Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán, Chimaltenango, Guatemala.
David FloodCenter for Research in Indigenous Health, Wuqu' Kawoq, Tecpán, Chimaltenango, Guatemala.
Institute for Urban Indigenous Health · AUBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for the Study of Equity and Governance in Health Systems · GTJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild stunting is a critical global health issue. Guatemala has one of the world's highest levels of stunting despite the sustained commitment to international nutrition policy best practices endorsed by the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) movement. Our objective was to use Guatemala as a case study to project the impact of a recently published national nutrition policy, the Great Crusade, that is consistent with SUN principles.

methodsWe used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to project the impact of scaling-up of nutrition interventions proposed in the Great Crusade and recommended by SUN. Our outcomes were changes in stunting prevalence, number of stunting cases averted, and number of cases averted by intervention in children under 5 years of age from 2020 to 2030. We considered 4 scenarios: (1) intervention coverage continues based on historical trends, (2) coverage targets in the Great Crusade are achieved, (3) coverage targets in the Great Crusade are achieved with reduced fertility risk, and (4) coverage reaches an aspirational level.

resultsAll scenarios led to modest reductions in stunting prevalence. In 2024, stunting prevalence was estimated to change by -0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.0%,-0.2%) if historical trends continue, -1.1% (95% CI=-0.8%,-1.5%) in the Great Crusade scenario, and -2.2% (95% CI=-1.6%,-3.0%) in the aspirational scenario. In 2030, we projected a stunting prevalence of -0.4% (95% CI=-0.2%,-0.8%) and -3.7% (95% CI=-2.8%,-5.1%) in the historical trends and aspirational scenario, respectively. Complementary feeding, sanitation, and breastfeeding were the highest-impact interventions across models.

conclusionsTargeted reductions in child stunting prevalence in Guatemala are unlikely to be achieved solely based on increases in intervention coverage. Our results show the limitations of current paradigms recommended by the international nutrition community. Policies and strategies are needed to address the broader structural drivers of stunting.

Indexed as

Growth DisordersInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGuatemalaHumansInfantNutrition PolicySanitation

Identifiers

PMID34933973
PMCPMC8691882
OpenAlexW4225937385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.