Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34933761›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2022

Family size and duration of fertility in female cancer survivors: a population-based analysis.

Richard A Anderson, Tom W Kelsey, David S Morrison, W Hamish B Wallace

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Subsequent pregnancies after a diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Richard.anderson@ed.ac.uk.
Tom W KelseySchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
David S MorrisonPublic Health Scotland, South Gyle, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
W Hamish B WallaceDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Public Health Scotland · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1Medical Research Council MR/W019140/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess family size and timescale for achieving pregnancy in women who remain fertile after cancer.

designPopulation-based analysis.

settingNational databases. PATIENT(S): All women diagnosed with cancer before the age of 40 years in Scotland, 1981-2012 (n = 10,267) with no previous pregnancy; each was matched with 3 population controls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number and timing of pregnancy and live birth after cancer diagnosis, to 2018. RESULT(S): In 10,267 cancer survivors, the hazard ratio for a subsequent live birth was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.58) overall. In women who achieved a subsequent pregnancy, age at live birth increased (mean ± SD, 31.2 ± 5.5 vs. 29.7 ± 6.1 in controls), and the family size was lower (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1 live births). These findings were consistent across several diagnoses. The interval from diagnosis to last pregnancy was similar to that of controls (10.7 ± 6.4 vs. 10.9 ± 7.3 years) or significantly increased, for example, after breast cancer (6.2 ± 2.8 vs. 5.3 ± 3.3 years) and Hodgkin lymphoma (11.1 ± 5.1 vs. 10.1 ± 5.8 years). CONCLUSION(S): These data quantify the reduced chance of live birth after cancer. Women who subsequently conceived achieved a smaller family size than matched controls, but the period of time after cancer diagnosis across which pregnancies occurred was similar or, indeed, increased. Thus, we did not find evidence that women who were able to achieve a pregnancy after cancer had a shorter timescale over which they have pregnancies.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFamily CharacteristicsFertilityReproductive HealthAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLive BirthMaternal AgeNeoplasmsParityScotlandTime FactorsTime-to-PregnancycancerFertilityreproductive lifespansurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID34933761
PMCPMC8865032
OpenAlexW4200041684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.