ArticleFertility and sterility2022
Family size and duration of fertility in female cancer survivors: a population-based analysis.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Let's TOC Fertility: A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial of the Telehealth Oncofertility Care (TOC) intervention in children, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.Contemporary clinical trials · 2024Trial
- Reproductive outcomes in women with Hodgkin's lymphoma in a Danish fertility preservation cohort.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Subsequent pregnancies after a diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Live birth and maternity outcome in childhood and adolescent cancer survivors under 18 years at diagnosis: a 40-year population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Primary oocytes with cellular senescence features are involved in ovarian aging in mice.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association of platinum-based chemotherapy with live birth and infertility in female survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer.Fertility and sterility · 2024Article
- Primary oocytes with cellular senescence features are involved in ovarian aging in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Clinical and self-reported markers of reproductive function in female survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Why are they not coming back? A single-center follow-up study on oncological women oocyte's storing for fertility preservation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Impact of Cancer on Pregnancy and Fertility Service Use in Reproductive-Aged Women.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess family size and timescale for achieving pregnancy in women who remain fertile after cancer.
designPopulation-based analysis.
settingNational databases. PATIENT(S): All women diagnosed with cancer before the age of 40 years in Scotland, 1981-2012 (n = 10,267) with no previous pregnancy; each was matched with 3 population controls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The number and timing of pregnancy and live birth after cancer diagnosis, to 2018. RESULT(S): In 10,267 cancer survivors, the hazard ratio for a subsequent live birth was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.58) overall. In women who achieved a subsequent pregnancy, age at live birth increased (mean ± SD, 31.2 ± 5.5 vs. 29.7 ± 6.1 in controls), and the family size was lower (2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.1 live births). These findings were consistent across several diagnoses. The interval from diagnosis to last pregnancy was similar to that of controls (10.7 ± 6.4 vs. 10.9 ± 7.3 years) or significantly increased, for example, after breast cancer (6.2 ± 2.8 vs. 5.3 ± 3.3 years) and Hodgkin lymphoma (11.1 ± 5.1 vs. 10.1 ± 5.8 years). CONCLUSION(S): These data quantify the reduced chance of live birth after cancer. Women who subsequently conceived achieved a smaller family size than matched controls, but the period of time after cancer diagnosis across which pregnancies occurred was similar or, indeed, increased. Thus, we did not find evidence that women who were able to achieve a pregnancy after cancer had a shorter timescale over which they have pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.