Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34933570›Full record

Trial reportCirculation2022

Association Between Age and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial.

Tristram D Bahnson, Anna Giczewska, Daniel B Mark, Andrea M Russo, Kristi H Monahan, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Adam P Silverstein, Jeanne E Poole, Kerry L Lee, Douglas L Packer and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00911508 nacompletednot on this map

Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2009 to 2017Enrolled2,204ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation, ArrhythmiaArmsLeft atrial ablation, Rate or Rhythm Control Therapy
NCT07424690 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Effect of Catheter Ablation on Elderly Population With Atrial Fibrillation; a Randomized Controlled Study; The ACE-AF Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2026 to 2034Enrolled282ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation (AF), Atrial Fibrillation Ablation, ElderlyArmsCatheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Optimized Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation, Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR), AV Node Ablation With Pacemaker implantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. The impact of catheter ablation in patient's heart failure and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The future of PFA in cardiac ablation procedures.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Residual thromboembolic risk and outcomes of oral anticoagulation discontinuation after atrial fibrillation ablation: a target trial emulation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Adverse events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive nationwide cohort study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tristram D BahnsonDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-9001-506X
Anna GiczewskaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-0533-2453
Daniel B MarkDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-6340-8087
Andrea M RussoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-3129-6161
Kristi H MonahanMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.H.M., D.L.P.).ORCID 0000-0003-2074-9986
Hussein R Al-KhalidiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-1375-0487
Adam P SilversteinDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-2013-5087
Jeanne E PooleUniversity of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (J.E.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-8481-7389
Kerry L LeeDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (T.D.B., A.G., D.B.M., H.R.A.-K., A.P.S., K.L.L.).
Douglas L PackerMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.H.M., D.L.P.).ORCID 0000-0003-2060-869X
CABANA Investigators
Duke University · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

CABANA-AF TrialU01HL089786 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AL-KHALIDI, HUSSEIN · 2009 to 2014
$10.7M
Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrilllation TriaU01HL089709 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PACKER, DOUGLAS L · 2009 to 2014
$4.4M
Cabana Image Analysis LabU01HL089645 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROBB, RICHARD A · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
CABANA EQOL TrialU01HL089907 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2009 to 2014
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089645NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089709NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089786NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational data suggest that catheter ablation may be safe and effective to treat younger and older patients with atrial fibrillation. No large, randomized trial has examined this issue. This report describes outcomes according to age at entry in the CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation).

methodsPatients with atrial fibrillation ≥65 years of age, or <65 with ≥1 risk factor for stroke, were randomly assigned to catheter ablation versus drug therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, the composite of mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, and recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Treatment effect estimates were adjusted for baseline covariables using proportional hazards regression models.

resultsOf 2204 patients randomly assigned in CABANA, 766 (34.8%) were <65 years of age, 1130 (51.3%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 308 (14.0%) were ≥75 years of age. Catheter ablation was associated with a 43% reduction in the primary outcome for patients <65 years of age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.30-1.09]), a 21% reduction for 65 to 74 years of age (aHR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.54-1.16]), and an indeterminate effect for age ≥75 years of age (aHR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.75-2.58]). Four-year event rates for ablation versus drug therapy across age groups, respectively, were 3.2% versus 7.8%, 7.8% versus 9.6%, and 14.8% versus 9.0%. For every 10-year increase in age, the primary outcome aHR increased (ie, less favorable to ablation) an average of 27% (interaction

conclusionsWe found age-based variations in clinical outcomes for catheter ablation compared with drug therapy, with the largest relative and absolute benefits of catheter ablation in younger patients. No prognostic benefits for ablation were seen in the oldest patients. No differences were found by age in treatment-related complications or in the relative effectiveness of catheter ablation in preventing recurrent atrial arrhythmias. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT00911508.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationStrokeAgedAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsHemorrhageHumansRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia Agentsage groupsanti-arrhythmia agentsatrial fibrillationcatheter ablationpulmonary veins

Identifiers

PMID34933570
PMCPMC9003625
OpenAlexW4200055226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.