Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34933388›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

Analysis of the Role of Female Hormones During Infection by COVID-19.

David Balbino Pascoal, Isabela Macêdo de Araujo, Lorenna Peixoto Lopes, Cristiane Monteiro da Cruz

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David Balbino PascoalDepartment of Medicine, Centro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, AL, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8320-2366
Isabela Macêdo de AraujoDepartment of Medicine, Centro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, AL, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0663-3493
Lorenna Peixoto LopesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, AL, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3798-5531
Cristiane Monteiro da CruzDepartment of Medicine, Centro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, AL, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-9137
Centro Universitário Cesmac · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women have metabolic, immunological, and genetic variables that ensure more protection from coronavirus infection. However, the indication of treatment for several pathologies and contraception is determined by hormones that have adverse effects and raise doubts about their use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the present study searches women specificities and the relation between female sexual hormones and COVID-19, and reports the main recommendations in this background. To this end, a review of the literature was conducted in the main databases, auxiliary data sources, and official websites. Therefore, considering the hypercoagulability status of COVID-19, the debate about the use of contraceptives due to the relative risk of thromboembolic effects that they impose arises. However, the current available evidence, as well as the recommendations of main health organs around the world, demonstrate that the use of hormonal contraceptives must be maintained during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19ContraceptionContraceptives, Oral, HormonalFemaleHormonesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Contraceptives, Oral, HormonalHormones

Identifiers

PMID34933388
PMCPMC10183921
OpenAlexW4200154775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.