Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34933233›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2022

Functional connectivity alterations between default mode network and occipital cortex in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Tal Geffen, Jonathan Smallwood, Carsten Finke, Sebastian Olbrich, Zsuzsika Sjoerds, Florian Schlagenhauf

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tal GeffenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: tal.geffen@charite.de.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Carsten FinkeDepartment of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian OlbrichDepartment for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Zsuzsika SjoerdsCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain & Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Florian SchlagenhaufDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered brain network connectivity is a potential biomarker for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A meta-analysis of resting-state MRI studies by Gürsel et al. (2018) described altered functional connectivity in OCD patients within and between the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), and the frontoparietal network (FPN), as well as evidence for aberrant fronto-striatal circuitry. Here, we tested the replicability of these meta-analytic rsfMRI findings by measuring functional connectivity during resting-state fMRI in a new sample of OCD patients (n = 24) and matched controls (n = 33). We performed seed-to-voxel analyses using 30 seed regions from the prior meta-analysis. OCD patients showed reduced functional connectivity between the SN and the DMN compared to controls, replicating previous findings. We did not observe significant group differences of functional connectivity within the DMN, SN, nor FPN. Additionally, we observed reduced connectivity between the visual network to both the DMN and SN in OCD patients, in particular reduced functional connectivity between lateral parietal seeds and the left inferior lateral occipital pole. Furthermore, the right lateral parietal seed (associated with the DMN) was more strongly correlated with a cluster in the right lateral occipital cortex and precuneus (a region partly overlapping with the Dorsal Attentional Network (DAN)) in patients. Importantly, this latter finding was positively correlated to OCD symptom severity. Overall, our study partly replicated prior meta-analytic findings, highlighting hypoconnectivity between SN and DMN as a potential biomarker for OCD. Furthermore, we identified changes between the SN and the DMN with the visual network. This suggests that abnormal connectivity between cortex regions associated with abstract functions (transmodal regions such as the DMN), and cortex regions associated with constrained neural processing (unimodal regions such as the visual cortex), may be important in OCD.

Indexed as

Default Mode NetworkObsessive-Compulsive DisorderBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysOccipital LobeFunctional connectivityNeuropsychiatryOCDResting-state fMRISeed analysis

Identifiers

PMID34933233
PMCPMC8688720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.