Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932889›Full record

Trial reportObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2022

Randomized controlled trial of financial incentives during weight-loss induction and maintenance in online group weight control.

Delia S West, Rebecca A Krukowski, Courtney M Monroe, Melissa L Stansbury, Chelsea A Carpenter, Eric A Finkelstein, Shelly Naud, Doris Ogden, Jean R Harvey

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Delia S WestDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4375-2785
Rebecca A KrukowskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9193-2783
Courtney M MonroeDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Melissa L StansburyDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3842-4880
Chelsea A CarpenterDepartment of Clinical & Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Eric A FinkelsteinDuke-NUS Medical School, and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6443-9686
Shelly NaudDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Doris OgdenDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Jean R HarveyDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Vermont · USDuke University · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

INTERNET SUPPORT FOR LONG-TERM WEIGHT MAINTENANCER01DK056746 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HARVEY, JEAN R, WEST, DELIA SMITH · 2000 to 2019
$10.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the impact of a financial incentive scheme integrating process and outcome incentives across weight-loss induction and weight maintenance on 18-month weight outcomes.

methodsThis was a randomized controlled trial. Participants with overweight or obesity (n = 418; 91% female; 28% racial/ethnic minority) were randomized to an 18-month, online, group-based behavioral weight-control program (Internet-Only) or the same program with financial incentives provided for 12 months, contingent on self-regulatory weight-control behaviors (self-weighing, dietary self-monitoring, and physical activity) and weight-outcome benchmarks (Internet+Incentives). No financial incentives were provided from Months 13 to 18 to examine the durability of weight-control behaviors and outcomes without incentives.

resultsWeight-loss induction at Month 6 was significantly greater for Internet+Incentives than Internet-Only (6.8% vs. 4.9%, respectively, p = 0.01). Individuals receiving incentives were significantly more likely to maintain weight loss ≥ 5% at Month 12 (45% in Internet+Incentives vs. 32% in Internet-Only, p < 0.02) and remain weight stable (39% vs. 27%, respectively, p < 0.01). Internet+Incentives participants also reported significantly greater behavioral engagement through Month 12. However, once incentives ceased, there were no differences in sustained weight outcomes (Month 18), and engagement declined dramatically.

conclusionsDespite promoting greater treatment engagement and initial weight loss, financial incentives as offered in this study did not promote better extended weight control.

Indexed as

MotivationWeight Reduction ProgramsEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID34932889
PMCPMC10519100
OpenAlexW4200511529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.