Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932711›Full record

ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2021

Streptococcus mutans adherence to conventional and self-ligating brackets: an in vitro study.

Murilo Fernando Neuppmann Feres, Fernanda Vicioni-Marques, Fábio Lourenço Romano, Marina Guimarães Roscoe, Vinícius Matsuzaki de Souza, Aline Lira Torneri, Bruno Bueno-Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Murilo Fernando Neuppmann FeresUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Clínica Infantil (Ribeirão Preto/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-544X
Fernanda Vicioni-MarquesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Clínica Infantil (Ribeirão Preto/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1741-3365
Fábio Lourenço RomanoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Clínica Infantil (Ribeirão Preto/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-3520
Marina Guimarães RoscoeUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral (São Paulo/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-4649
Vinícius Matsuzaki de SouzaPrivate practice (Guarulhos/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-3303
Aline Lira TorneriUniversidade de Guarulhos, Programa de Pós-Graduação, Mestrado em Ortodontia (Guarulhos/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-8048
Bruno Bueno-SilvaUniversidade de Guarulhos, Programa de Pós-Graduação, Mestrado em Ortodontia (Guarulhos/SP, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3275-5910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough self-ligating brackets presumably provide better hygiene conditions, no consensus has been reached so far.

objectiveTherefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, in an in vitro experimental design, the adherence of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in self-ligating and conventional brackets of different manufacturers and ligature types.

methodsFour commercial brands of maxillary premolar metal brackets were tested (Abzil®; Morelli®; 3M Unitek®; and GAC®). Each one was subdivided into three groups, which varied according to the type of ligature and bracket model (metallic, elastic, and self-ligating), totalizing twelve groups, composed of six brackets each. Previously sterilized brackets were initially immersed in saliva for one hour, and subsequently washed and added in a bacterial suspension, maintained in aerobiosis for 72 hours. The adhered bacteria were then separated and quantified by colony forming units (CFU/mL) counting after 48 hours of growth. The groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post-hoc tests (p< 0.05).

resultsRegardless of the commercial brand, self-ligating brackets had significantly less CFU/mL. However, according to comparisons performed within each commercial brand, only Abzil® self-ligating brackets had significantly lower biofilm adhesion. Among all of the self-ligating models, GAC® brackets presented the highest bacterial adhesion rate.

conclusionsSelf-ligating brackets are likely to present lower rates of biofilm adhesion. Particularly, Abzil® and GAC® self-ligating brackets are less likely to accumulate biofilm. Although such results are derived from an in vitro study, practitioners might acknowledge findings concerning bacterial adhesion as one of the relevant features to be considered during bracket selection.

Indexed as

Orthodontic BracketsStreptococcus mutansBacterial AdhesionOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthodontic WiresResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID34932711
PMCPMC8690864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.