Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932701›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2021

Factors associated with diagnosis of stages I and II lung cancer: a multivariate analysis.

Isabel Cristina Martins Emmerick, Anupama Singh, Maggie Powers, Feiran Lou, Poliana Lin, Mark Maxfield, Karl Uy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel Cristina Martins EmmerickUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Division of Thoracic Surgery. Department of Surgery. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-2465
Anupama SinghUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-4584
Maggie PowersUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Division of Thoracic Surgery. Department of Surgery. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8584-0310
Feiran LouUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Division of Thoracic Surgery. Department of Surgery. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4965-4094
Poliana LinUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Division of Thoracic Surgery. Department of Surgery. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5011-0388
Mark MaxfieldUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Division of Thoracic Surgery. Department of Surgery. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-5414
Karl UyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School. Division of Thoracic Surgery. Department of Surgery. Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-1342
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present the overall survival rate for lung cancer and identify the factors associated with early diagnosis of stage I and II lung cancer.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study including individuals diagnosed with lung cancer, from January 2009 to December 2017, according to the cancer registry at UMass Memorial Medical Center. Five-year overall survival and its associated factors were identified by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox's proportional hazards model. Factors associated with diagnosing clinical stage I and II lung cancer were identified by bivariate and multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression (Log-likelihood ratio (LR)) at 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsThe study was conducted with data on 2730 individuals aged 67.9 years on average, 51.5% of whom female, 92.3% white, and 6.6% never smoked. Five-year overall survival was 21%. Individuals diagnosed with early-stage disease had a 43% five-year survival rate compared to 8% for those diagnosed at late stages. Stage at diagnosis was the main factor associated with overall survival [HR = 4.08 (95%CI: 3.62-4.59)]. Factors associated with early diagnosis included patients older than 68 years [OR = 1.23 (95%CI: 1.04-1.45)], of the female gender [OR = 1.47 (95%CI: 1.24-1.73)], white [OR = 1.63 (95%CI: 1.16-2.30)], and never-smokers [OR = 1.37 (95%CI: 1.01-1.86)]; as well as tumors affecting the upper lobe [OR = 1.46 (95%CI: 1.24-1.73)]; adenocarcinoma [OR = 1.43 (95%CI: 1.21-1.69)]; and diagnosis after 2014 [OR = 1.61 (95%CI: 1.37-1.90)].

conclusionsStage at diagnosis was the most decisive predictor for survival. Non-white and male individuals were more likely to be diagnosed at a late stage. Thus, promoting lung cancer early diagnosis by improving access to health care is vital to enhance overall survival for individuals with lung cancer.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsBrazilFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34932701
PMCPMC8664062
OpenAlexW4205766020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.