Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932242›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2022

COVID-19 worries, concerns and mitigation behaviours: A snapshot of Nepal during the first wave.

Melanie S Askari, Emily Treleaven, Dirgha Ghimire, William Axinn, Sabrina Hermosilla

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie S AskariInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Emily TreleavenInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Dirgha GhimireInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
William AxinnInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Sabrina HermosillaInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USInstitute for Social and Environmental Research-Nepal · NP

Funding

Population Studies Center Infrastructure GrantR24HD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI XIE, YU · 2001 to 2016
$13.2M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 2017 to 2026
$6.5M
Understanding the Connections among Genes, Environment, Family Processes, and Mental HealthR01MH110872 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AXINN, WILLIAM G., SMOLLER, JORDAN W · 2017 to 2020
$3.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041028NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041028NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand COVID-19 worries and how they influence COVID-19 mitigation behaviours, especially in communities prior to case surges, in Nepal.

methodsData related to COVID-19 impacts on life disruptions were collected from households in the Chitwan Valley Family Study, a 25-year community panel study, during February-April 2021. COVID-19 worry was measured by the extent of respondent concern for themselves or household members getting COVID-19 in the prior 2 weeks. 11 items examined COVID-19 mitigation behaviours. Logistic regression models assessed associations between socio-demographic characteristics and COVID-19 worry and then the influence of worry on any mitigation behaviour and behaviour type adjusting for age, education, sex, ethnicity and COVID-19 exposure, accounting for neighbourhood clustering.

resultsOf 2,678 households with a responding adult, ages 18-88, 394 (14.7%) reported moderate-to-extreme COVID-19 worry and 1,214 (45.3%) engaged in three or more mitigation behaviours. Prevalence of mitigation behaviours was higher among those with COVID-19 worry (e.g. avoided crowds: 62.7% versus 40.5% in those with minimal worry). Respondents self-reporting COVID-19 had higher odds of worry (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13, 6.57). Odds of any mitigation behaviour were higher among those with COVID-19 worry compared to those with minimal worry (aOR: 6.19, 95% CI = 1.88, 20.35).

conclusionsCOVID-19 mitigation behaviours were more common in people with COVID-19 worry. To address current and potential future waves of the pandemic, public health efforts should include informational campaigns about mitigation behaviours particularly for those unconcerned with COVID-19 risks.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Educational StatusFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNepalPrevalenceSociodemographic FactorsYoung AdultCOVID-19epidemiologyinternational health

Identifiers

PMID34932242
PMCPMC8906281
OpenAlexW4200603060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.