ArticleNeotropical entomology2022
Histology of Damage Caused by Euschistus heros (F.) Nymphs in Soybean Pods and Seeds.
Article in Neotropical entomology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral RNAi in Euschistus heros: Evaluation of Gene Silencing Using Cationic Polymer-Stabilized dsRNA.Neotropical entomology · 2026Article
- Qualitative vs. Quantitative Damage: Identifying Critical Susceptibility Interval of Common Bean toInsects · 2026Article
- Entomopathogenic fungi disrupt the feeding behavior of Euschistus heros in soybean.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- CanJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Neotropical brown stink bug, Euschistus heros (F.), feeds on stems, leaves, pods, and seeds of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Knowledge of the damage that nymphs at different instars can cause to soybean pods and seeds, as well as efficient histological techniques for locating the salivary sheath are sparse. This study developed a new double-staining method to facilitate distinguishing the salivary sheath from plant tissues and to anatomically evaluate the damage caused by nymphs of different instars as they feed on soybean pods and seeds. Five insects from each of the analyzed instars (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th) per pod at the R6 stage (full pod-filling) were kept in clip cages for 48 h of feeding. The salivary sheath was analyzed to localize the damage (pod, vascular bundle, and seed) and the depth reached by the damage (categorized tissue). Double staining with xylidine ponceau and toluidine blue provided the best differentiation between the salivary sheath and watery sheath (proteins stained red) and the plant tissues (stained blue). First instar nymphs do not feed. Second instar and older nymphs caused damage to seeds, which became more severe with later developmental stages. The damage consists of coalescence of protein bodies and degradation and breakdown of the cell wall, marked by darkened regions in the embryo tissue of seeds. The information generated will contribute to new studies on feeding habits and emphasizes the need to control E. heros in early development stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34932199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.