ArticleGeroScience2022
Classical risk factors for primary coronary artery disease from an aging perspective through Mendelian Randomization.
Article in GeroScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mendelian randomization studies on coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Large-scale genome-wide interaction analyses on multiple cardiometabolic risk factors to identify age-specific genetic risk factors.GeroScience · 2025Article
- The Application of Mendelian Randomization in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction: Current Status and Future Prospects.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Overweight as a Causal Factor Contributing to Better Survival at the Oldest Old Ages: A Mendelian Randomization Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Is being overweight a causal factor in better survival among the oldest old? a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in aging · 2024Article
- Investigating the Association between Coronary Artery Disease and the Liver Fibrosis-4 Index in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- The association of measures of body shape and adiposity with incidence of cardiometabolic disease from an ageing perspective.GeroScience · 2023Article
- Association between systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with coronary heart disease according to age.PloS one · 2023Article
- Role of endocrine PACAP in age-related diseases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The significance of classical risk factors in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear in older age due to possible changes in underlying disease pathologies. Therefore, we conducted Mendelian Randomization approaches to investigate the causal relationship between classical risk factors and primary CAD in different age groups. A Mendelian Randomization study was conducted in European-ethnicity individuals from the UK Biobank population. Analyses were performed using data of 22,313 CAD cases (71.6% men) and 407,920 controls (44.5% men). Using logistic regression analyses, we investigated the associations between standardized genetic risk score and primary CAD stratified by age of diagnosis. In addition, feature importance and model accuracy were assessed in different age groups to evaluate predictive power of the genetic risk scores with increasing age. We found age-dependent associations for all classical CAD risk factors. Notably, body mass index (OR 1.22 diagnosis < 50 years; OR 1.02 diagnosis > 70 years), blood pressure (OR 1.12 < 50 years; OR 1.04 > 70 years), LDL cholesterol (OR 1.16 < 50 years; OR 1.02 > 70 years), and triglyceride levels (OR 1.11 < 50 years; 1.04 > 70 years). In line with the Mendelian Randomization analyses, model accuracy and feature importance of the classical risk factors decreased with increasing age of diagnosis. Causal determinants for primary CAD are age dependent with classical CAD risk factors attenuating in relation with primary CAD with increasing age. These results question the need for (some) currently applied cardiovascular disease risk reducing interventions at older age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.