Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932184›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2022

Classical risk factors for primary coronary artery disease from an aging perspective through Mendelian Randomization.

Swetta A Jansen, Bas Huiskens, Stella Trompet, JWouter Jukema, Simon P Mooijaart, Ko Willems van Dijk, Diana van Heemst, Raymond Noordam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of endocrine PACAP in age-related diseases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swetta A JansenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bas HuiskensData Science Lab, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stella TrompetDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
JWouter JukemaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Simon P MooijaartDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ko Willems van DijkDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Diana van HeemstDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Raymond NoordamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. r.noordam@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-809X
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1996001/9454Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of classical risk factors in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear in older age due to possible changes in underlying disease pathologies. Therefore, we conducted Mendelian Randomization approaches to investigate the causal relationship between classical risk factors and primary CAD in different age groups. A Mendelian Randomization study was conducted in European-ethnicity individuals from the UK Biobank population. Analyses were performed using data of 22,313 CAD cases (71.6% men) and 407,920 controls (44.5% men). Using logistic regression analyses, we investigated the associations between standardized genetic risk score and primary CAD stratified by age of diagnosis. In addition, feature importance and model accuracy were assessed in different age groups to evaluate predictive power of the genetic risk scores with increasing age. We found age-dependent associations for all classical CAD risk factors. Notably, body mass index (OR 1.22 diagnosis < 50 years; OR 1.02 diagnosis > 70 years), blood pressure (OR 1.12 < 50 years; OR 1.04 > 70 years), LDL cholesterol (OR 1.16 < 50 years; OR 1.02 > 70 years), and triglyceride levels (OR 1.11 < 50 years; 1.04 > 70 years). In line with the Mendelian Randomization analyses, model accuracy and feature importance of the classical risk factors decreased with increasing age of diagnosis. Causal determinants for primary CAD are age dependent with classical CAD risk factors attenuating in relation with primary CAD with increasing age. These results question the need for (some) currently applied cardiovascular disease risk reducing interventions at older age.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMendelian Randomization AnalysisAgingFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleRisk FactorsAgingCoronary artery diseaseLDL cholesterolMendelian RandomizationRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34932184
PMCPMC9213623
OpenAlexW4200172255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.