Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932180›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Evaluation of Adverse Effects of Topical Glaucoma Medications on Trabeculectomy Outcomes Using the Glaucoma Medications Intensity Index.

Jasper Ka Wai Wong, Tsz Kin Leung, Jimmy Shiu-Ming Lai, Jonathan Cheuk-Hung Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in Glaucoma Fellowship Surgical Experience.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical Tear Fluid Proteomics-A Novel Tool in Glaucoma Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasper Ka Wai WongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Block B, Cyberport 4, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Tsz Kin LeungLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jimmy Shiu-Ming LaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Block B, Cyberport 4, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jonathan Cheuk-Hung ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Block B, Cyberport 4, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. jonochan@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-8178
Cyberport · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrabeculectomy is commonly performed for glaucoma when medications are unable to control disease progression or have intolerable adverse effects. Previous studies have suggested that a higher number of and/or longer treatment duration with preoperative topical glaucoma medications are associated with a higher risk of trabeculectomy failure, but most of these studies lack quantification of exposure. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative exposure to topical glaucoma medications and trabeculectomy outcome, using a new method for quantifying accumulated exposure.

methodsConsecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) who underwent primary trabeculectomy between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The Glaucoma Medications Intensity Index (GMII) was calculated for each eye by multiplying the number of drops per week by duration of use (in years). The relationship between the GMII and postoperative outcome in terms of 1- and 2-year success rates and survival time was analyzed.

resultsA total of 55 eyes from 40 subjects were analyzed, all with follow-up > 6 months (mean 2.72 ± 1.46 years). The GMII for eyes with successful (n = 41) and failed (n = 14) outcome at last visit was 111.71 ± 78.59 and 167.41 ± 85.04, respectively, and significantly higher in failed eyes (P = 0.03). Univariate regression analysis of age, gender, cup-disc ratio, previous phacoemulsification, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, preoperative number of glaucoma medications/treatment duration/intraocular pressure (IOP), and GMII showed age and GMII to be possible predictors of treatment failure. On subsequent multivariate analysis, only GMII was correlated with failure (odds ratio 1.021, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.05; P = 0.05). When GMII ≥ 80, the postoperative survival time was shorter (P = 0.02), the 1-year IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and number of needlings performed were higher (P = 0.03, P  < 0.01, P  < 0.03, respectively), and reduction in glaucoma medication was less (P = 0.02).

conclusionThe GMII can be used to predict eyes at higher risk for trabeculectomy that may benefit from additional perioperative intervention or treatment. It can also help the surgeon time the surgery before the GMII becomes too high, thereby optimizing the patient's postoperative outcome.

Indexed as

Filtration surgery outcomeGlaucoma medicationsMedication exposureTrabeculectomy outcomeTreatment intensity

Identifiers

PMID34932180
PMCPMC8770766
OpenAlexW4200026896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.