Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932152›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Combining the quantitative faecal immunochemical test and full blood count reliably rules out colorectal cancer in a symptomatic patient referral pathway.

Mark S Johnstone, Paul Burton, Georgios Kourounis, Jack Winter, Emilia Crighton, David Mansouri, Paul Witherspoon, Karen Smith, Stephen T McSorley

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark S JohnstoneAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. mark.johnstone.2@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-1517
Paul BurtoneHealth, Corporate Services, Business Intelligence, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Georgios KourounisAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jack WinterDepartment of Gastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Emilia CrightonPublic Health, Health Service, Public Health Screening, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
David MansouriDepartment of Coloproctology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Paul WitherspoonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Karen SmithDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Stephen T McSorleyAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFaecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) has proven utility for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) detection in symptomatic patients. Most studies have examined FIT in symptomatic patients subsequently referred from primary care. We investigated associations between CRC and FIT in both referred and non-referred symptomatic patients.

methodsA retrospective, observational study of all patients with a FIT submitted Aug 2018 to Jan 2019 in NHS GG&C was performed. Referral to colorectal/gastroenterology and decision to perform colonoscopy were recorded. FIT results were grouped as f-Hb < 10/10-149/150-399/ ≥ 400 μg/g. The MCN cancer registry identified new cases of CRC. Covariables were compared using the χ

resultsA total of 4968 patients were included. Raised FIT correlated with decision to refer (p < 0.001) and scope (p < 0.001). With 23-month median follow-up, 61 patients were diagnosed with CRC. These patients were older (median 69 vs 59 years, cancer and no cancer respectively, p = 0.001), more likely to be male (55.7% vs 42.1%, p = 0.033), and to report rectal bleeding (51.7% vs 36.1%, p = 0.013). FIT (< 10 µg/g 8.2% vs 76.7% and ≥ 400 µg/g 55.7% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001) and anaemia (45.9% vs 19.7%, p < 0.001) were associated with CRC. On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.023), male sex (p = 0.04), FIT (≥ 400 OR 54.256 (95% CI:20.683-142.325; p < 0.001)), and anaemia (OR 1.956 (1.071-3.574; p = 0.029)) independently predicted CRC. One patient (0.04%) with a negative FIT and normal haemoglobin had CRC.

conclusionGP referral and secondary care investigation patterns were influenced by FIT. The combination of normal Hb and f-Hb excluded CRC in 99.96% of cases, providing excellent reassurance to those prioritising access to endoscopy services.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerColonoscopyFecesFemaleHemoglobinsHumansMaleOccult BloodReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityHemoglobinsColorectalFaecalFITImmunochemicalSymptomaticTest

Identifiers

PMID34932152
PMCPMC8803704
OpenAlexW4200364874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.