Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932121›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Assessment of pain associated with bovine respiratory disease and its mitigation with flunixin meglumine in cattle with induced bacterial pneumonia.

Miriam S Martin, Michael D Kleinhenz, Brad J White, Blaine T Johnson, Shawnee R Montgomery, Andrew K Curtis, Mikaela M Weeder, Dale A Blasi, Kelli M Almes, Raghu G Amachawadi and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Uncontrolled pain: a call for better study design.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam S MartinDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Michael D KleinhenzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-3657
Brad J WhiteDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Blaine T JohnsonDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology & Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-6515
Shawnee R MontgomeryDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Andrew K CurtisDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Mikaela M WeederDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Dale A BlasiDepartment of Animal Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Kelli M AlmesDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology & Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Raghu G AmachawadiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Harith M SalihDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology & Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Matt D MiesnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Angela K BaysingerMerck Animal Health, De Soto, KS 66018.
Jason S NickellMerck Animal Health, De Soto, KS 66018.
Johann F CoetzeeDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-3991
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive 2017-67015-27124Miriam Martin is a Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research 548795National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-67015-34084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleuritic chest pain from bacterial pneumonia is often reported in human medicine. However, studies investigating pain associated with bovine respiratory disease (BRD) are lacking. The objectives of this study were to assess if bacterial pneumonia elicits a pain response in calves with experimentally induced BRD and to determine the analgesic effects of transdermally administered flunixin. A total of 26 calves, 6-7 mo of age, with no history of BRD were enrolled into one of three treatment groups: 1) experimentally induced BRD + transdermal flunixin at 3.3 mg/kg twice, 24 h apart (BRD + FTD); 2) experimentally induced BRD + placebo (BRD + PLBO); and 3) sham induction + placebo (CNTL + PLBO). Calves induced with BRD were inoculated with Mannheimia haemolytica via bronchoalveolar lavage. Outcomes were collected from -48 to 192 h post-treatment and included serum cortisol, infrared thermography, mechanical nociceptive threshold, substance P, kinematic gait analysis, visual analog scale (VAS), clinical illness score, computerized lung score, average activity and rumination level, prostaglandin E2 metabolite, plasma serum amyloid A, and rectal temperature. Outcomes were evaluated using either a generalized logistic mixed model for categorical variables or a generalized linear mixed model for continuous variables. Right front force differed by treatment (P = 0.01). The BRD + PLBO had lower mean force applied to the right front limb (85.5 kg) compared with BRD + FTD (96.5 kg; P < 0.01). Average VAS differed by a treatment by time interaction (P = 0.01). The VAS scores differed for BRD + PLBO at -48 (3.49 mm) compared with 168 and 192 h (13.49 and 13.64 mm, respectively) (P < 0.01). Activity for BRD + PLBO was higher at -48 h (27 min/h) compared with 48, 72, 120, and 168 h (≤ 22.24 min/h; P < 0.01). Activity differed by a treatment by time interaction (P = 0.01). Activity for BRD + FTD was higher at -48 and 0 h (28.2 and 28.2 min/h, respectively) compared to 48, 72, 96, and 168 h (≤23.7 min/h; P < 0.01). Results show a combination of reduced activity levels, decreased force on the right front limb, and increased VAS pain scores all support that bacterial pneumonia in cattle is painful. Differences in right front force indicate that flunixin transdermal may attenuate certain pain biomarkers in cattle with BRD. These findings suggest that BRD is painful and analgesic drugs may improve the humane aspects of care for cattle with BRD.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesPneumonia, BacterialAnimalsCattleClonixinPainPain MeasurementClonixinflunixin megluminebiomarkersBRDlung lesion scorespain

Identifiers

PMID34932121
PMCPMC8849227
OpenAlexW4200552924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.