ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Accurate Evaluation of Corneal Treatment Zone After Orthokeratology.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Concepts and clinical application of digital 3D microscopy].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Automatic measurement and evaluation of anterior segment anatomical structures via UBM images using a deep learning-based approach.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- A Multimodal Multitask Artificial Intelligence Model for Orthokeratology Contact Lens Fitting: An Integrated Framework to Enhance Lens Centration and Myopia Control Effect.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Advancements in AI-based quantitative analysis of fundus tessellation and its application in myopia research.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in refractive error management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives.Clinical optometry · 2025Review
- Analysis of corneal surface shape following overnight orthokeratology with different optical zone diameters.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-aided diagnosis and treatment in the field of optometry.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the corneal topography based on deep learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Shaping the future of myopia with artificial intelligence: Mapping trends and promising directions.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
- Artificial intelligence and digital solutions for myopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Given the robust effectiveness of inhibiting myopia progression, orthokeratology has gained increasing popularity worldwide. However, identifying the boundary and the center of reshaped corneal area (i.e., treatment zone) is the main challenging task in evaluating the performance of orthokeratology. Here we present automated deep learning algorithms to solve the challenges. Methods: A total of 6328 corneal topographical maps, including 2996 axial subtractive maps and 3332 tangential subtractive maps, were collected from 2044 myopic patients who received orthokeratology. The boundary and the center of the treatment zones were annotated by experts as ground truths using axial subtractive maps and tangential subtractive maps, respectively. The algorithms based on neural network structures of fully convolutional networks (FCNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to automatically identify the boundary and the center of the treatment zone, respectively. Results: The algorithm of FCNs identified the treatment zone boundaries with an accuracy intersection over union (IoU) of 0.90 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD; range, 0.60-0.97). The algorithm of CNNs also identified the treatment zone centers with an average deviation of 0.22 ± 0.22 mm (range, 0.01-1.66 mm). Conclusions: These results show that a deep learning-based solution is able to provide an automatic and accurate tool to accomplish the two main challenges of orthokeratology. Translational Relevance: Deep learning in orthokeratology can shorten the time while maintaining accurate results in clinical practice, which enables clinicians to help more patients daily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.