Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932118›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Accurate Evaluation of Corneal Treatment Zone After Orthokeratology.

Yong Tang, Zhao Chen, Weijia Wang, Longbo Wen, Linjing Zhou, Mao Wang, Fan Tang, He Tang, Weizhong Lan, Zhikuan Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Automatic measurement and evaluation of anterior segment anatomical structures via UBM images using a deep learning-based approach.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yong TangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Zhao ChenAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Weijia WangSchool of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Longbo WenAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Linjing ZhouSchool of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Mao WangInformation Center, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Changsha, China.
Fan TangInformation Center, Aier Eye Hospital Group, Changsha, China.
He TangSchool of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Weizhong LanAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhikuan YangAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNCentral South University · CNHe Eye Hospital · CNHunan Provincial Science and Technology Department · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Given the robust effectiveness of inhibiting myopia progression, orthokeratology has gained increasing popularity worldwide. However, identifying the boundary and the center of reshaped corneal area (i.e., treatment zone) is the main challenging task in evaluating the performance of orthokeratology. Here we present automated deep learning algorithms to solve the challenges. Methods: A total of 6328 corneal topographical maps, including 2996 axial subtractive maps and 3332 tangential subtractive maps, were collected from 2044 myopic patients who received orthokeratology. The boundary and the center of the treatment zones were annotated by experts as ground truths using axial subtractive maps and tangential subtractive maps, respectively. The algorithms based on neural network structures of fully convolutional networks (FCNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to automatically identify the boundary and the center of the treatment zone, respectively. Results: The algorithm of FCNs identified the treatment zone boundaries with an accuracy intersection over union (IoU) of 0.90 ± 0.06 (mean ± SD; range, 0.60-0.97). The algorithm of CNNs also identified the treatment zone centers with an average deviation of 0.22 ± 0.22 mm (range, 0.01-1.66 mm). Conclusions: These results show that a deep learning-based solution is able to provide an automatic and accurate tool to accomplish the two main challenges of orthokeratology. Translational Relevance: Deep learning in orthokeratology can shorten the time while maintaining accurate results in clinical practice, which enables clinicians to help more patients daily.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMyopiaOrthokeratologic ProceduresCorneaCorneal TopographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID34932118
PMCPMC8709934
OpenAlexW4200547695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.