Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932011›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Co-designing an Adaption of a Mobile App to Enhance Communication, Safety, and Well-being Among People Living at Home With Early-Stage Dementia: Protocol for an Exploratory Multiple Case Study.

Karen Davies, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Bie Nio Ong, Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Katherine Perryman, Caroline Sanders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Family Carer Involvement in Dementia Care Research: A Scoping Review and Expert Consultation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen Davies *National Institute for Health Research Patient Safety Research Translation Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-8357
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi *National Institute for Health Research Patient Safety Research Translation Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-0683
Bie Nio Ong *National Institute for Health Research Patient Safety Research Translation Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-8139
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi *National Institute for Health Research Patient Safety Research Translation Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-0683
Katherine Perryman *National Institute for Health Research Patient Safety Research Translation Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-6991
Caroline Sanders *National Institute for Health Research Patient Safety Research Translation Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-928X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing interest in using mobile apps to support communication, safety, and well-being. Evidence directly from people with dementia regarding the usability, usefulness, and relevance of mobile apps is limited.

objectiveThis paper describes the protocol of a study that will evaluate an app designed for supporting communication, safety, and well-being among people living with dementia. The study aims to understand if the app can enhance safety through improved communication among users.

methodsThe study will use participatory qualitative methods over 3 cycles of evaluation with co-designers (service users, their families, and care practitioners). The study will be developed in partnership with a specialist home care service in England. Purposive case selection will be performed to ensure that the cases exemplify differences in experiences. The app will be evaluated in a walk-through workshop by people living with early-stage dementia and then trialed at home by up to 12 families in a try-out cycle. An amended version will be evaluated in a final walk-through workshop during cycle 3. Data will be collected from at least 4 data sources during the try-out phase and analyzed thematically. An explanatory multiple case study design will be used to synthesize and present the evidence from the three cycles, drawing on the Normalization Process Theory to support the interpretation of the findings.

resultsThe study is ready to be implemented, but it was paused to protect vulnerable individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The findings will be particularly relevant for understanding how to support vulnerable people living in the community during social distancing and the period following the pandemic as well as for providing insight into the challenges of social isolation that arise from living with dementia.

conclusionsEvaluating a mobile app for enhancing communication, safety, and well-being among people living with dementia contributes to the key ambitions enshrined in policy and practice-championing the use of digital technology and supporting people with dementia to live safely in their own homes. The study will involve co-designers living with dementia, so that the voices of service users can be used to highlight the benefits and challenges of assistive technology and shape the future development of apps that enhance safety by improving communication. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/19543.

Indexed as

co-designcommunicationdementiadesign researchmobile appmobile phonesafety

Identifiers

PMID34932011
PMCPMC8726030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.