Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931909›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2022

Solutions to problems of nonexistence of parameter estimates and sparse data bias in Poisson regression.

Ashwini Joshi, Angelika Geroldinger, Lena Jiricka, Pralay Senchaudhuri, Christopher Corcoran, Georg Heinze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashwini JoshiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Angelika GeroldingerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Section for Clinical Biometrics, 27271Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-4911
Lena JirickaCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Section for Clinical Biometrics, 27271Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pralay SenchaudhuriCytel Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christopher CorcoranJon M. Huntsman School of Business, Department for Data Analytics and Information Systems, 4606Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Georg HeinzeCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Section for Clinical Biometrics, 27271Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-8491

Funding

New Methods to reduce Bias and Mean Square Error of Maximum Likelihood EstimatorsR44GM104597 · NIGMS · CYTEL, INC · PI SENCHAUDHURI, PRALAY · 2012 to 2013
$938k
NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM104597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poisson regression can be challenging with sparse data, in particular with certain data constellations where maximum likelihood estimates of regression coefficients do not exist. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of methods that give finite regression coefficients when maximum likelihood estimates do not exist, including Firth's general approach to bias reduction, exact conditional Poisson regression, and a Bayesian estimator using weakly informative priors that can be obtained via data augmentation. Furthermore, we include in our evaluation a new proposal for a modification of Firth's approach, improving its performance for predictions without compromising its attractive bias-correcting properties for regression coefficients. We illustrate the issue of the nonexistence of maximum likelihood estimates with a dataset arising from the recent outbreak of COVID-19 and an example from implant dentistry. All methods are evaluated in a comprehensive simulation study under a variety of realistic scenarios, evaluating their performance for prediction and estimation. To conclude, while exact conditional Poisson regression may be confined to small data sets only, both the modification of Firth's approach and the Bayesian estimator are universally applicable solutions with attractive properties for prediction and estimation. While the Bayesian method needs specification of prior variances for the regression coefficients, the modified Firth approach does not require any user input.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremBiasHumansLikelihood FunctionsSARS-CoV-2Count dataFirth’s penalizationgeneralized linear modelspenalized regressionPoisson regressionseparation

Identifiers

PMID34931909
PMCPMC8829730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.