Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931504›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary science2022

Seroprevalence of

Siyu Zhou, Ziyin Sang, Lijun Wang, Tangjie Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Serological and molecular investigation ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Serological and molecular survey ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siyu ZhouInstitute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-9982
Ziyin SangInstitute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3036-4123
Lijun WangInstitute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-6551
Tangjie ZhangInstitute of Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-6298
Yangzhou University · CN

Funding

Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses 225009Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

objectivesWe investigated the seropositive rate of

methodsWe retrieved 20 studies, with a total of 5,158 cats, published between 2016 and 2020, used the DerSimonian-Laird model and calculated seroprevalence estimates with the variance stabilizing double arcsine transformation.

resultsThe overall seroprevalence rate after sinusoidal conversion was 19.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.9-23.9; 966/5,158), lower than the domestic report from 1995 to 2015 (24.5%, 95% CI, 20.1-29.0). There was substantial heterogeneity among studies (χ² = 262.32;

conclusionsArticles published in recent five years suggest that the seroprevalence estimates of

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalAnimalsCatsChinaRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic Studiescatsmainland Chinameta-analysisseroprevalenceToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID34931504
PMCPMC8799937
OpenAlexW4225555984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.