Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931415›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Patients at the centre after a health care incident: A scoping review of hospital strategies targeting communication and nonmaterial restoration.

Rachel I Dijkstra, Ruud T J Roodbeen, Renée J R Bouwman, Antony Pemberton, Roland Friele

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patients at the centre after a health care incident: A scoping review of hospital strategies targeting communication and nonmaterial restoration.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel I DijkstraDepartment of Criminal Law, Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-3696
Ruud T J RoodbeenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7315-4367
Renée J R BouwmanNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antony PembertonDepartment of Criminal Law, Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-5142
Roland FrieleNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to provide an overview of the strategies adopted by hospitals that target effective communication and nonmaterial restoration (i.e., without a financial or material focus) after health care incidents, and to formulate elements in hospital strategies that patients consider essential by analysing how patients have evaluated these strategies.

backgroundIn the aftermath of a health care incident, hospitals are tasked with responding to the patients' material and nonmaterial needs, mainly restoration and communication. Currently, an overview of these strategies is lacking. In particular, a gap exists concerning how patients evaluate these strategies. SEARCH STRATEGY AND INCLUSION CRITERIA: To identify studies in this scoping review, and following the methodological framework set out by Arksey and O'Malley, seven subject-relevant electronic databases were used (PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO and Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection). Reference lists of included studies were also checked for relevant studies. Studies were included if published in English, after 2000 and as peer-reviewed articles. MAIN RESULTS AND SYNTHESIS: The search yielded 13,989 hits. The review has a final inclusion of 16 studies. The inclusion led to an analysis of five different hospital strategies: open disclosure processes, communication-and-resolution programmes, complaints procedures, patients-as-partners in learning from health care incidents and subsequent disclosure, and mediation. The analysis showed three main domains that patients considered essential: interpersonal communication, organisation around disclosure and support, and desired outcomes. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: This scoping review specifically takes the patient perspective in its methodological design and analysis. Studies were included if they contained an evaluation by patients, and the included studies were analysed on the essential elements for patients.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHospitalsCommunicationHumanscommunicationhealth care incidenthospital strategiespatientsrestoration

Identifiers

PMID34931415
PMCPMC8849248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.