Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931293›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Development of a repeated-measures predictive model and clinical risk score for mortality in ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Justyna Bartoszko, George Dranitsaris, M Elizabeth Wilcox, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Sangeeta Mehta, Miki Peer, Matteo Parotto, Isaac Bogoch, Sheila Riazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Justyna BartoszkoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, 323-200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
George DranitsarisDepartment of Public Health, Falk College, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
M Elizabeth WilcoxInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lorenzo Del SorboInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sangeeta MehtaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Miki PeerDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, 323-200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Matteo ParottoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, 323-200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Isaac BogochDivision of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sheila RiaziDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, 323-200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada. sheila.riazi@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0670-1516

Funding

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused intensive care units (ICUs) to reach capacities requiring triage. A tool to predict mortality risk in ventilated patients with COVID-19 could inform decision-making and resource allocation, and allow population-level comparisons across institutions.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included all mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 admitted to three tertiary care ICUs in Toronto, Ontario, between 1 March 2020 and 15 December 2020. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify variables predictive of mortality. The primary outcome was the probability of death at three-day intervals from the time of ICU admission (day 0), with risk re-calculation every three days to day 15; the final risk calculation estimated the probability of death at day 15 and beyond. A numerical algorithm was developed from the final model coefficients.

resultsOne hundred twenty-seven patients were eligible for inclusion. Median ICU length of stay was 26.9 (interquartile range, 15.4-52.0) days. Overall mortality was 42%. From day 0 to 15, the variables age, temperature, lactate level, ventilation tidal volume, and vasopressor use significantly predicted mortality. Our final clinical risk score had an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 0.9). For every ten-point increase in risk score, the relative increase in the odds of death was approximately 4, with an odds ratio of 4.1 (95% CI, 2.9 to 5.9).

conclusionOur dynamic prediction tool for mortality in ventilated patients with COVID-19 has excellent diagnostic properties. Notwithstanding, external validation is required before widespread implementation.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19COVID-19 mortalityprediction tool

Identifiers

PMID34931293
PMCPMC8687635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.