Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931262›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2022

Receptor architecture of macaque and human early visual areas: not equal, but comparable.

Lucija Rapan, Meiqi Niu, Ling Zhao, Thomas Funck, Katrin Amunts, Karl Zilles, Nicola Palomero-Gallagher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MEBRAINS 1.0: A new population-based macaque atlas.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucija Rapan *Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany. l.jankovic-rapan@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6582-5826
Meiqi Niu *Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany. m.niu@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7937-5814
Ling ZhaoInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Thomas FunckInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Katrin AmuntsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Karl Zilles
Nicola Palomero-GallagherInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany. n.palomero-gallagher@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-8578

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GQ1902Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft InterLabs-0015Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 785907Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 945539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing cytoarchitectonic maps of the human and macaque posterior occipital cortex differ in the number of areas they display, thus hampering identification of homolog structures. We applied quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography to characterize the receptor architecture of the primary visual and early extrastriate cortex in macaque and human brains, using previously published cytoarchitectonic criteria as starting point of our analysis. We identified 8 receptor architectonically distinct areas in the macaque brain (mV1d, mV1v, mV2d, mV2v, mV3d, mV3v, mV3A, mV4v), and their respective counterpart areas in the human brain (hV1d, hV1v, hV2d, hV2v, hV3d, hV3v, hV3A, hV4v). Mean densities of 14 neurotransmitter receptors were quantified in each area, and ensuing receptor fingerprints used for multivariate analyses. The 1st principal component segregated macaque and human early visual areas differ. However, the 2nd principal component showed that within each species, area-specific differences in receptor fingerprints were associated with the hierarchical processing level of each area. Subdivisions of V2 and V3 were found to cluster together in both species and were segregated from subdivisions of V1 and from V4v. Thus, comparative studies like this provide valuable architectonic insights into how differences in underlying microstructure impact evolutionary changes in functional processing of the primate brain and, at the same time, provide strong arguments for use of macaque monkey brain as a suitable animal model for translational studies.

Indexed as

MacacaVisual CortexAnimalsAutoradiographyBrain MappingHumansOccipital LobeReceptors, NeurotransmitterVisual PathwaysReceptors, NeurotransmitterBrain mappingComparative analysisCytoarchitectureHomologyVisual processing

Identifiers

PMID34931262
PMCPMC9046358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.