Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931259›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2021

Optimization of Spray-Drying Parameters for Formulation Development at Preclinical Scale.

Marika Nespi, Robert Kuhn, Chun-Wan Yen, Joseph W Lubach, Dennis Leung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marika NespiSmall Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.
Robert KuhnSmall Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.
Chun-Wan YenSmall Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA. Yen.Chunwan@gene.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-335X
Joseph W LubachSmall Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.
Dennis LeungSmall Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spray-drying dispersion (SDD) is a well-established manufacturing technique used to prepare amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs), allowing for poorly soluble drugs to have improved bioavailability. However, the process of spray-drying with multiple factors and numerous variables can lead to a lengthy development timeline with intense resource requirements, which becomes the main obstacle limiting spray-drying development at the preclinical stage. The purpose of this work was to identify optimized preset parameters for spray-drying to support the early development of ASDs suitable for most circumstances rather than individual optimization. First, a mini-DoE (Design of Experiment) study was designed to evaluate the critical interplay of two key variables for spray-drying using a BUCHI B-290 mini spray dryer: solid load and atomizing spray gas flow. The critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the ASDs, including yield, particle size, morphology, and in vitro release profile, were taken into account to identify the impact of the key variables. The mini-DoE results indicated that a 5% solid load (w/v %) and 35 mm height atomizing spray gas flow were the most optimized parameters. These predefined values were further verified using different formulation compositions, including various polymers (Eudragit L100-55, HPMCAS-MF, PVAP, and PVP-VA64) and drugs (G-F, GEN-A, Indomethacin, and Griseofulvin), a range of drug loading (10 to 40%), and scale (200 mg to 200 g). Using these predefined parameters, all ASD formulations resulted in good yields as well as consistent particle size distribution. This was despite the differences in the formulations, making this a valuable and rapid approach ideal for early development. This strategy of leveraging the preset spray-drying parameters was able to successfully translate into a reproducible and efficient spray-drying platform while also saving material and reducing developmental timelines in early-stage formulation development.

Indexed as

particle sizepreclinical formulationspray-drying, amorphous solid dispersionyields

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.