ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2021
Optimization of Spray-Drying Parameters for Formulation Development at Preclinical Scale.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining of Spray Drying and Dry Granulation to Prepare Orodispersible Tablets: Influence of Spray-Dried Particle Size on Tablet Properties.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
- Selection of Solubility Enhancement Technologies for S-892216, a Novel COVID-19 Drug Candidate.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Pharmaceutical Spray Drying: Modeling, Process Optimization, and Emerging Trends with Machine Learning.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Electrostatic spraying for fine-tuning particle dimensions to enhance oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- The Fabrication, Drug Loading, and Release Behavior of Porous Mannitol.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spray-drying dispersion (SDD) is a well-established manufacturing technique used to prepare amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs), allowing for poorly soluble drugs to have improved bioavailability. However, the process of spray-drying with multiple factors and numerous variables can lead to a lengthy development timeline with intense resource requirements, which becomes the main obstacle limiting spray-drying development at the preclinical stage. The purpose of this work was to identify optimized preset parameters for spray-drying to support the early development of ASDs suitable for most circumstances rather than individual optimization. First, a mini-DoE (Design of Experiment) study was designed to evaluate the critical interplay of two key variables for spray-drying using a BUCHI B-290 mini spray dryer: solid load and atomizing spray gas flow. The critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the ASDs, including yield, particle size, morphology, and in vitro release profile, were taken into account to identify the impact of the key variables. The mini-DoE results indicated that a 5% solid load (w/v %) and 35 mm height atomizing spray gas flow were the most optimized parameters. These predefined values were further verified using different formulation compositions, including various polymers (Eudragit L100-55, HPMCAS-MF, PVAP, and PVP-VA64) and drugs (G-F, GEN-A, Indomethacin, and Griseofulvin), a range of drug loading (10 to 40%), and scale (200 mg to 200 g). Using these predefined parameters, all ASD formulations resulted in good yields as well as consistent particle size distribution. This was despite the differences in the formulations, making this a valuable and rapid approach ideal for early development. This strategy of leveraging the preset spray-drying parameters was able to successfully translate into a reproducible and efficient spray-drying platform while also saving material and reducing developmental timelines in early-stage formulation development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34931259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.