Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34931145›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2022

COVID-19 Infection Is Associated With New Onset Erectile Dysfunction: Insights From a National Registry.

Kevin Y Chu, Sirpi Nackeeran, Laura Horodyski, Thomas A Masterson, Ranjith Ramasamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Post-COVID Syndrome.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 vaccination does not affect male sexual functions.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tip of the iceberg: erectile dysfunction and COVID-19.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin Y ChuDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Sirpi NackeeranDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Laura HorodyskiDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Thomas A MastersonDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ranjith RamasamyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: ramasamy@miami.edu.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe short- and long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on erectile function and penile vasculature remains poorly understood and is of particular importance as the virus has been found to be present within the penile tissue.

aimWe determined the association of COVID-19 infection and subsequent diagnoses of erectile dysfunction.

methodsWe assessed the risk of ED in men with COVID-19 in the United States (US) using the TriNetX Research Network, a federated electronic medical records network of over 42 healthcare organizations and 66 million patients from the US. We identified adult men (≥ 18 years) with a recorded COVID-19 infection (ICD-10-CM B34.2, U07.1, U07.2, J12.81, J12.82, B97.29) since January 1, 2020, and compared them to an equivalent number of adult men who did not have COVID-19 over the same timeframe. Men with prior history or diagnosis of ED before January 1, 2020 were excluded. We accounted for confounding variables through propensity score matching for age, race, body mass index (BMI), and history of the following comorbid medical conditions: diabetes mellitus (E11), hypertension (I10), ischemic heart disease (I20-25), or hyperlipidemia (E78). OUTCOMES: We assessed the association between COVID-19 and ED (N52) as a primary outcome through regression analysis with statistical significance assessed at

resultsPrior to propensity score matching, men with COVID-19 were found to be older than men without COVID-19 (47.1 ± 21.4 vs 42.4 ± 24.3 years). Additionally, men with COVID-19 were noted to have increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) when compared to men without COVID-19 (13% DM and 27% HTN vs 7% DM and 22% HTN). After propensity score matching, we compared 230,517 men with COVID-19 to 232,645 men without COVID-19 and found that COVID-19 diagnosis was significantly associated with ED (odds ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.248, CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings indicate that clinicians should consider evaluating erectile dysfunction among men with recent COVID-19 diagnoses and counsel them regarding the risk of developing erectile dysfunction. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include large sample size and adjustment for confounding variables. Limitations include reliance on a global federated dataset, retrospective study design, and lack of data regarding ED (mild vs moderate vs severe), COVID-19 infection severity, or history of prostate cancer and radiation.

conclusionThere is an increased chance of new onset erectile dysfunction post-COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Endothelial DysfunctionErectile Dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID34931145
PMCPMC8673874
OpenAlexW4200062650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.